Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

On 16/02/2018 15:33, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Robert Wilton writes: Hi Lada, On 16/02/2018 09:06, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Robert Wilton writes: I should add, as a contributor, I have read this document and think that is ready for advancement. I have

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

Robert Wilton writes: > Hi Lada, > > > On 16/02/2018 09:06, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Robert Wilton writes: >> >>> I should add, as a contributor, I have read this document and think that >>> is ready for advancement. >>> >>> I have three minor comments:

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

Hi Lada, On 16/02/2018 09:06, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Robert Wilton writes: I should add, as a contributor, I have read this document and think that is ready for advancement. I have three minor comments: 1) module "feature" in YANG library is a leaf-list, but currently

[netmod] YANG modules publication: what to focus on next? Feb 16th

Dear all, At the last IETF meeting, Alia, Deborah and I looked at the publication status of most YANG modules. Since that time, I've been keeping a summary of the situation. Let me share it with everybody. Before publishing YANG modules, we have two series of bottlenecks: - the YANG module

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

Andy Bierman writes: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:03:32PM +, Robert Wilton wrote: >> > >> > 1) module "feature" in YANG library is a leaf-list, but currently it

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] LC on YANG Library (bis)

Robert Wilton writes: > I should add, as a contributor, I have read this document and think that > is ready for advancement. > > I have three minor comments: > > 1) module "feature" in YANG library is a leaf-list, but currently it is > a list in YANG libary bis. I suspect