A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Lou Berger, a Chair of
the netmod working group.
-
Working Group Name: Network Modeling
Area Name: Operations and Management Area
Session Requester: Lou Berger
Number of Sessions:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 07:18:38PM +0200, Robert Varga wrote:
> > On 23/04/18 18:51, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > > Some people will say that the cost of a new language version is high.
>
Andy Bierman wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I do not understand the need for a yang-data structure that represents
> > data
> > > that can be instantiated anywhere and everywhere.
> >
> > AFAIK noone is proposing that.
> >
> > > I do not want to break
> > > existing tools that
>
> >
> > I do not understand the need for a yang-data structure that represents
> data
> > that can be instantiated anywhere and everywhere.
>
> AFAIK noone is proposing that.
>
> > I do not want to break
> > existing tools that expect sibling data nodes in the same module
> namespace
> > to
Hi,
I am not sure what this statement tells us re. the issue in this email
thread.
/martin
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 02:56:51PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > I am much more concerned with some of the post-1.1 features,
Andy Bierman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:28 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> > Andy Bierman wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:52 PM, Martin Bjorklund
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Andy Bierman
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 07:18:38PM +0200, Robert Varga wrote:
> On 23/04/18 18:51, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > Some people will say that the cost of a new language version is high.
> > (Well, when we did 1.1, some people said it will never be deployed.)
> > Anyway, not bumping the YANG
On 23/04/18 18:51, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> Some people will say that the cost of a new language version is high.
> (Well, when we did 1.1, some people said it will never be deployed.)
> Anyway, not bumping the YANG version number but having instead several
> (optional) language extensions
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 02:56:51PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> I am much more concerned with some of the post-1.1 features, also
> because YANG is now being updated in several directions without a
> clear vision. And another big problem is that YANG extensions are
> used for these changes, so
On 22/04/18 14:56, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> One example: YANG 1.1 was supposed to be a backwards-compatible, yet it
>> introduced multiple-inheritence to a language which was previously
>> strictly single-inheritence. That sort of change is a major revision of
>> the metamodel and certainly does
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:28 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Andy Bierman wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:52 PM, Martin Bjorklund
> wrote:
> >
> > > Andy Bierman wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:47 AM,
Andy Bierman wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:52 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> > Andy Bierman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Martin Bjorklund
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Andy
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:52 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Andy Bierman wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Martin Bjorklund
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Andy Bierman wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018
Andy Bierman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Andy Bierman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Kent Watsen
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I like Andy's
14 matches
Mail list logo