Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

2018-10-08 Thread Xufeng Liu
support. Thanks, - Xufeng On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 2:48 PM Kent Watsen wrote: > The IETF 102 in-room poll should really good support to adopt > this draft, and no objections. > > This email starts an adoption poll for: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00 > > Please

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll

2018-10-08 Thread Xufeng Liu
yes/support. Thanks, - Xufeng On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 7:39 AM Lou Berger wrote: > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04 a working group > document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or > "no/do not support". If

[netmod] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-03

2018-10-08 Thread Andy Bierman
Reviewer: Andy Bierman Review result: Almost Ready Overall: - no compiler warnings; passes --ietf check as well Normative Sections: sec 1: - YANG version cited should be RFC 7950, not 6020. YANG 1.1 is used in this document.\ sec 4: Relationship with RFC 7317 - this section

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll for draft-clemm-netmod-nmda-diff-00

2018-10-08 Thread Alexander Clemm
I would second the request for one format (which is mandatory to support), which must be specified. YANG-Patch is the logical candidate IMHO. To allow selection of other formats using an input parameter makes sense, but adds some complexity from there: How to know which formats are

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll

2018-10-08 Thread Alexander Clemm
Support --- Alex > -Original Message- > From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 4:39 AM > To: NetMod WG > Cc: NetMod WG Chairs > Subject: [netmod] WG adoption poll > > All, > > This is start of a two week poll on making >

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8342 (5514)

2018-10-08 Thread Kent Watsen
> After reading the RFC details, it seems that the example is intentional based > on > the text about NP-containers. > > I think an errata could be used because the sentence about a top-level origin > must be defined > could be interpreted to define "top-level" as the topmost level for which

Re: [netmod] Place to download Standard YANG Modules ?

2018-10-08 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Balázs Lengyel wrote: > Hello Martin, > > Thanks for the info. > > Yang-Catalog does not allow the download of modules. AFAIK it only > gives you metadata about the modules. > You mentioned download from pyang. How does that work? I just meant that the pyang github repo contains the published

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8342 (5514)

2018-10-08 Thread Andy Bierman
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Lou Berger wrote: > > > On 10/8/2018 10:13 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 08:57:33AM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: >> >>> I think it's clear that the reviewers, notably myself as shepherd, missed >>> that this is a lowercase "must" and

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8342 (5514)

2018-10-08 Thread Lou Berger
Hi Rob, On 10/8/2018 9:51 AM, Robert Wilton wrote: Hi Lou, On 08/10/2018 13:57, Lou Berger wrote: Hi Rob/All, Keep in mind that the document says what it says and that to change text really requires a new version. On 10/8/2018 6:01 AM, Robert Wilton wrote: So there seem to be two

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8342 (5514)

2018-10-08 Thread Lou Berger
On 10/8/2018 10:13 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 08:57:33AM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: I think it's clear that the reviewers, notably myself as shepherd, missed that this is a lowercase "must" and should have asked for clarification during the review process. Having

Re: [netmod] Place to download Standard YANG Modules ?

2018-10-08 Thread Lou Berger
On 10/8/2018 9:23 AM, Balázs Lengyel wrote: Hello Martin, Thanks for the info. Yang-Catalog does not allow the download of modules. AFAIK it only gives you metadata about the modules. You mentioned download from pyang. How does that work? I used https://github.com/YangModels/yang for some

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8342 (5514)

2018-10-08 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 08:57:33AM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: > > I think it's clear that the reviewers, notably myself as shepherd, missed > that this is a lowercase "must" and should have asked for clarification > during the review process. > > Having an errata saying this "must" really is a

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8342 (5514)

2018-10-08 Thread Robert Wilton
Hi Lou, On 08/10/2018 13:57, Lou Berger wrote: Hi Rob/All, Keep in mind that the document says what it says and that to change text really requires a new version. On 10/8/2018 6:01 AM, Robert Wilton wrote: So there seem to be two available solutions here: (i) The server MUST provide an

Re: [netmod] Place to download Standard YANG Modules ?

2018-10-08 Thread Balázs Lengyel
Hello Martin, Thanks for the info. Yang-Catalog does not allow the download of modules. AFAIK it only gives you metadata about the modules. You mentioned download from pyang. How does that work? I used https://github.com/YangModels/yang for some time, but I don't know how up to date that

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8342 (5514)

2018-10-08 Thread Lou Berger
Hi Rob/All, Keep in mind that the document says what it says and that to change text really requires a new version. On 10/8/2018 6:01 AM, Robert Wilton wrote: So there seem to be two available solutions here: (i) The server MUST provide an origin value for the top level datanode, This is

Re: [netmod] Place to download Standard YANG Modules ?

2018-10-08 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Hi, Balazs Lengyel wrote: > Hello, > > What is the best way to download standard Yang Modules? I know the > official answer is to download all the standards then extract the > modules, however this is a "bit" cumbersome. Is there any better way? > We had a git earlier. How up to date is that?

[netmod] Place to download Standard YANG Modules ?

2018-10-08 Thread Balazs Lengyel
Hello, What is the best way to download standard Yang Modules? I know the official answer is to download all the standards then extract the modules, however this is a "bit" cumbersome. Is there any better way? We had a git earlier. How up to date is that? It would be wonderful if this could

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5517)

2018-10-08 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 13:56 +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Hi, > > I agree that the text needs clarification. However, I propose this > text instead: > > The derived-from-or-self() function returns "true" if any node in the > argument "nodes" is a node of type "identityref" or a type

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5517)

2018-10-08 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Hi, I agree that the text needs clarification. However, I propose this text instead: The derived-from-or-self() function returns "true" if any node in the argument "nodes" is a node of type "identityref" or a type derived from "identityref", and its value is an identity that is equal to

[netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2018-10-08 Thread IETF Secretariat
The NETMOD WG has placed draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Lou Berger) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data/ Comment: Adoption poll:

[netmod] WG adoption poll

2018-10-08 Thread Lou Berger
All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04 a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8342 (5514)

2018-10-08 Thread Robert Wilton
So there seem to be two available solutions here: (i) The server MUST provide an origin value for the top level datanode, but for NP containers it can use whatever origin value it likes - since the origin value imparts no direct meaning other than the default origin that descendants acquire

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04

2018-10-08 Thread Balázs Lengyel
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Balazs On 2018. 10. 05. 19:58, Lou Berger wrote: Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of preparation for WG Adoption Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR

[netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5517)

2018-10-08 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950, "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language". -- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5517 -- Type: Technical Reported by: Rohit R