Re: [netmod] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with COMMENT)

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 09:33:09AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Hi, > > Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:35:28PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > > > >

Re: [netmod] schematree-statement extension?

On 15/10/2018 21:49, Kent Watsen wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Picking up on your YANG 1.2 comment. Please add a YANG-next issue, if this > is not being tracked already. https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues. https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues/53 I think I captured the gist of the

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-data-ext-01.txt

On 06/03/2018 00:56, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF. > > Title : YANG Data Extensions > Authors : Andy Bierman

Re: [netmod] xpath expressions in JSON

On 10/15/18 4:25 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Martin Bjorklund writes: Ladislav Lhotka wrote: On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 19:23 -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) wrote: On 2018-10-10, 9:59 AM, "netmod on behalf of Martin Bjorklund" <

Re: [netmod] schematree-statement extension?

Hi Robert, Picking up on your YANG 1.2 comment. Please add a YANG-next issue, if this is not being tracked already. https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues. Thanks, Kent -Original Message- From: netmod on behalf of Robert Varga Date: Monday, October 15, 2018 at 3:36 PM To:

Re: [netmod] schematree-statement extension?

On 15/10/2018 21:09, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Hi, > > Robert Varga wrote: >> It is wide-spread practice to use tailf:action and target statements >> within it with augment/deviate statements -- which I think is a failure >> to follow RFC7950 section 6.3.1: >> >>Care must be taken when

Re: [netmod] schematree-statement extension?

Hi, Robert Varga wrote: > Hello, > > I have recently been reminded that there is a potential interoperability > issue between RFC6020/RFC7950 and extension statements. So far the only > case where this has manifested is tailf:action, but there may be others > lurking in the future. > > The

[netmod] schematree-statement extension?

Hello, I have recently been reminded that there is a potential interoperability issue between RFC6020/RFC7950 and extension statements. So far the only case where this has manifested is tailf:action, but there may be others lurking in the future. The issue is that a YANG extension has no

Re: [netmod] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-03

Hi Andy, Please find our comment in line below Thanks, Ankit On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 06:15, Andy Bierman wrote: > Reviewer: Andy Bierman > Review result: Almost Ready > > > > > Overall: >- no compiler warnings; passes --ietf check as well > > Normative Sections: > > sec 1: >- YANG

Re: [netmod] xpath expressions in JSON

Martin Bjorklund writes: > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 19:23 -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) >> > >> > wrote: >> > > On 2018-10-10, 9:59 AM, "netmod on behalf of Martin Bjorklund" < >> > >

Re: [netmod] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with COMMENT)

Hi, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 03:35:28PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > > > draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: No Objection > > > > > > When responding, please keep