On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 6:59 PM Mahesh Jethanandani
wrote:
> This errata should be rejected for the following reason.
>
>
This errata should be rejected because the Errata process cannot be used to
update a module.
The normal WG document process needs to be used instead.
A new revision of the mo
Thanks Mahesh for clarification, one follow up question is
Why acl type is defined as an optional parameter, we use when statement for
each choice, let's say
"
choice l2 {
container eth {
when "derived-from-or-self(/acls/acl/type, "
+ "'
This errata should be rejected for the following reason.
The whole idea of defining the identities for acl-type was to allow vendors to
specify what capabilities their box is capable of supporting and then to
specify what capabilities the vendors want to support. As such there is no
“default ca
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8519,
"YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5762
--
Type: Technical
Re
> -Original Message-
> From: netmod On Behalf Of Ladislav Lhotka
> Sent: 25 June 2019 14:14
> To: netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] ?= ?==?utf-8?q? mandatory choice with non-presence
> container cas
>
> On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 13:59 +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Michal Vaško w
On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 13:59 +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Michal Vaško wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> > actually, I have used model with the container TOP just for
> > simplification, I have encountered the issue while implementing
> > ietf-ssh-server model from its current draft. I have created the
> >
Michal Vaško wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> actually, I have used model with the container TOP just for
> simplification, I have encountered the issue while implementing
> ietf-ssh-server model from its current draft. I have created the
> container "users" [1] without any "user" list instances. Now, you may
>
On Tue, 2019-06-25 at 09:58 +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > Kent Watsen writes:
> >
> > > Hi Michal,
> > > > I agree, but these valid data were correctly printed into invalid
> > > > data. I do not think printing is allowed to change the validity of
> > > > data.
>
Hi Rob,
actually, I have used model with the container TOP just for simplification, I
have encountered the issue while implementing ietf-ssh-server model from its
current draft. I have created the container "users" [1] without any "user" list
instances. Now, you may argue that this is still not
Hi Michal,
It is not the printing of the data that makes it valid/invalid.
I don't think that your input data was ever valid, because "container C"
doesn't satisfy the mandatory statement because it isn't a real data node in
the tree - it is instantiated when required and may be deleted when it
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Kent Watsen writes:
>
> > Hi Michal,
> >> I agree, but these valid data were correctly printed into invalid
> >> data. I do not think printing is allowed to change the validity of
> >> data.
> > The NP-container text is unclear.
>
> This issue IMO has more to do with
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:13:51AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't understand what is unclear about the current descriptions. Is
> > it the relations to the MIB objects that are unclear or is it the
> > descriptions in the YANG module? The o
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 09:13:51AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't understand what is unclear about the current descriptions. Is
> it the relations to the MIB objects that are unclear or is it the
> descriptions in the YANG module? The original question was:
>
> My question i
Kent Watsen writes:
Hi Michal,
I agree, but these valid data were correctly printed into
invalid data. I do not think printing is allowed to change the
validity of data.
The NP-container text is unclear.
This issue IMO has more to do with the "mandatory" statement under
"choice". Simi
Hi,
I don't understand what is unclear about the current descriptions. Is
it the relations to the MIB objects that are unclear or is it the
descriptions in the YANG module? The original question was:
My question is whether only configuration change of hardware
component will cause the updat
15 matches
Mail list logo
