[netmod] 答复: 答复: Please clarify implementation about ‘when’

2019-09-10 Thread Qin Wu
Why processing order matter? My interpretation is both leaf node values (i.e.,leaf a, leaf b) should be validated together and commit as a whole, RFC6241 said: “ If the device is unable to commit all of the changes in the candidate configuration datastore, then the running

[netmod] 答复: Please clarify implementation about ‘when’

2019-09-10 Thread Fengchong (frank)
Andy, Whether different result would occur according different process order? According 8.3.2 if server process ‘a= 3’ firstly, b will be deleted by system and becomes a non-exist schema node, and then when ‘b=5’ is processed , server will report a ‘unknown-element’ error. But if server

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-03.txt

2019-09-10 Thread Qin Wu
v-03 is posted, the main change is to update security section to address comments raised in last IETF meeting. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-03 -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 internet-dra...@ietf.org 发送时间: 2019年9月11日

[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-03.txt

2019-09-10 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF. Title : Factory Default Setting Authors : Qin Wu Balazs Lengyel

Re: [netmod] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2019-09-10 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 10:02:03PM +, Kent Watsen wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Thank you for your review. Comments below. > > Update @ https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-10 > > > Kent // as co-author >