The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8519,
"YANG Data Model for Network Access Control Lists (ACLs)".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5762
--
Status: Rejected
Ty
Qin wu wrote in the errata:
I am wondering why not set default value for acl-type,e.g., set default value
as "ipv4-acl-type" otherwise, how to determine which field under which choice
will be matched upon and which action should be taken on them if the opetional
parameter type under acl list i
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Over the course of this we we intend to process reported errata that
> we have outstanding in netmod
I started to go through the list and comment, but then I realized that
you probably didn't ask for comments? This was just a FYI?
/martin
