> On Mar 26, 2020, at 2:46 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> This WGLC has received zero responses, which is insufficient to progress the
> document at this time. The WGLC is therefore being extended for another
> week, now ending April 1st (the day before our Virtual Meeting on
The Network Modeling (netmod) Working Group will hold
a virtual interim meeting on 2020-04-02 from 11:00 to 13:00 UTC.
Agenda:
Agenda is forthcoming on https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/
Information about remote participation:
Remote participation information will be obtained at
Hello,
I created an update to rfcstrip in Github.
Revision 1.1balazs - 2020-03-26
added -a option. If it is specified, the file must be an XML2RFC
XML file.
All artworks will be extracted from it if they carry a name attribute.
Artwork unfolding will also be executed.
If the artwork contains the
Hi Rob,
The intent was to deconflict with LSR WG (meeting right after us)
and thought starting 4 hours later was pushing it too late for Asia.
Joel, is on PT agreed - although I'm sure he'd prefer later.
WG,
If the time is problematic for you and you expect to present/actively
Hi Lou,
Some folks have previously complained about other meetings starting so early:
11 am UTC = 4 am San Jose = 7 pm Beijing
Just to double check that you are happy with a 4 am start for any West Coast
based folks, perhaps there are not many of them involved in Netmod.
Thanks,
Rob
>
delete the one that does not map to 1100 UTC...
On 3/26/2020 12:06 PM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
There has been a suggestion to list all the meetings in UTC, so I've changed
this request to 12:00 UTC.
Okay?
I've noticed two requests for the same time, presumably the second one can just
be
Dear All,
This WGLC has received zero responses, which is insufficient to progress the
document at this time. The WGLC is therefore being extended for another week,
now ending April 1st (the day before our Virtual Meeting on April 2nd).
Again, positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this
There has been a suggestion to list all the meetings in UTC, so I've changed
this request to 12:00 UTC.
Okay?
I've noticed two requests for the same time, presumably the second one can just
be deleted?
Thanks,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
>
A new interim meeting request has just been submitted by Lou Berger.
This request requires approval by the Area Director of the Operations and
Management Area
The meeting can be approved here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim/request/interim-2020-netmod-01
A new interim meeting request has just been submitted by Lou Berger.
This request requires approval by the Area Director of the Operations and
Management Area
The meeting can be approved here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim/request/interim-2020-netmod-02
UPDATE
The NETMOD chairs just updated this request to occur 1-hour earlier to
deconflict with LSR.
We will send a Calendar ICS file shortly.
NETMOD Chairs
> On Mar 26, 2020, at 11:50 AM, IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
> wrote:
>
>
> A new interim meeting request has just been
Hello Kent,
OK, as you are strongly opposed to it, I will remove
in the next version.
That said, I do not really agree with you. If interested see, below.
Regards Balazs
-Original Message-
From: netmod On Behalf Of Kent Watsen
Sent: 2020. március 25., szerda 18:25
To: Balázs Lengyel
12 matches
Mail list logo
