Re: [netmod] Where can I use ?

Firstly, thank you for trying to improve our tooling! It took me some time to find, for others: https://github.com/BalazsLengyel/rfcstrip Running `rfcstrip -a` throws errors on MacOS. My workaround fix was to ` brew install grep` and

[netmod] NETMOD Virtual Meeting (ICS file)

NETMOD Virtual Meeting Hosted by NETMOD Working Group    PDT: 04:00-06:00    EDT: 07:00-09:00   UTC: 10:00-12:00   CST: 18:00-22:00 Agenda: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2020-netmod-01/materials/agenda-interim-2020-netmod-01-netmod-01 Join by WebEx

Re: [netmod] WGLC: draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-04

> On Mar 28, 2020, at 8:36 AM, tom petch wrote: > >> A wholesale lack of YANG reference clauses; perhaps half a dozen needed > I can see 2 places I might could put these, in the "astronomical-body" leaf > that references the IAU and in the "geodetic-system" for the default value. > We are

Re: [netmod] WGLC: draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-04

from: Mahesh Jethanandani Sent: 27 March 2020 17:37 Hi Tom, Not questioning the Not Ready status for the overall draft, but on the issues you raise about the yang model ... Mahesh see my reply to Christian - I think I have covered the points that you raise except why the tools do not give

Re: [netmod] WGLC: draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-04

From: Christian Hopps Sent: 27 March 2020 17:39 > On Mar 27, 2020, at 1:09 PM, tom petch wrote: > > Kent > > Not Ready > > e.g. > IANA considerations does not register the namespace so there is no module Will add. RFC8344 gets that right - note the reference to RFC6020 > Security

Re: [netmod] Interpreting revision labels as YANG semantic version numbers

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote: > Hi, > > https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/48 > > o 3.3 > > All revision labels that match the pattern for the "version" > typedef in the ietf-yang-semver YANG module MUST be interpreted as >

Re: [netmod] No descendent statements to input/output can be reordered

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote: > Hi, > > https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/47 > > o 3.1.1 > > o In statements that have any data definition statements as >substatements, those data definition substatements MAY be >

Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label statements

"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote: > Hi, > > https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/45 > > o 7.1 > > The text says: > > All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label statements for > all > newly published YANG