Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

2020-07-27 Thread Qin Wu
-邮件原件- 发件人: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de] 发送时间: 2020年7月27日 20:54 收件人: Qin Wu 抄送: netmod@ietf.org 主题: Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags in state "Candidate for WG Adoption" On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:33:39PM

Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host

2020-07-27 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
On 27. 07. 20 12:44, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:51:31AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Juergen Schoenwaelder writes: >> >>> So would the following do the right thing? >> >> The invert-match pattern also needs to be added in order to avoid reserved >> labels: >

Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

2020-07-27 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:33:39PM +, Qin Wu wrote: > -邮件原件- > 发件人: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de] > 发送时间: 2020年7月27日 18:42 > 收件人: Qin Wu > 抄送: netmod@ietf.org > 主题: Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags in > state

Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

2020-07-27 Thread Qin Wu
-邮件原件- 发件人: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de] 发送时间: 2020年7月27日 18:42 收件人: Qin Wu 抄送: netmod@ietf.org 主题: Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags in state "Candidate for WG Adoption" On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:13:43AM

Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host

2020-07-27 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:51:31AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Juergen Schoenwaelder writes: > > > So would the following do the right thing? > > The invert-match pattern also needs to be added in order to avoid reserved > labels: Why are they illegal? If we make them illegal, how are we

Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

2020-07-27 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:13:43AM +, Qin Wu wrote: > > On the technical side, it is not clear why a central list of tags providing > meta information is preferrable over metadata annotations that can be shipped > with the values. > > > [Qin]: If we take metadata annotation approach, we

Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

2020-07-27 Thread Qin Wu
Thanks Juergen for sharing your view on this draft, please see comments inline. -邮件原件- 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Juergen Schoenwaelder 发送时间: 2020年7月27日 16:48 收件人: netmod@ietf.org 主题: Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags in state

Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host

2020-07-27 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
Juergen Schoenwaelder writes: > So would the following do the right thing? The invert-match pattern also needs to be added in order to avoid reserved labels: > > typedef host-name { > type domain-name { > pattern '[a-zA-Z0-9\-\.]+'; pattern '(.*\.)?..\-\-.*' {

Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

2020-07-27 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
I do not understand the abstract of the document. The main sentence is this one: This YANG data node tagging method can be used to provide input, instruction, indication to selection filter and filter queries of operational state on a server during a "pub/sub" service for YANG