Re: [netmod] Comments on draft-ietf-netmod-sub-intf-vlan-model-05

2020-08-03 Thread Don Fedyk
Hi Rob Here is my feedback. -07 draft The one hole I see is that there is no mention of priority mapping. VLAN tags have priority. (see additional behavior in the 802.1 model below). For Priority: One might assume the traffic is 1:1 mapped for Ethernet ingress and egress vlans the

Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: yang:longitude, yang:latitude, yang:postal-code, yang:country-code

2020-08-03 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
Having skimmed draft-ietf-netmod-geo-location-05.txt again, I agree that people should use the grouping. The examples in Appendix A make it pretty clear that it is possible to report minimal values if that is desirable but having the flexibility to report more details may come in handy where

Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses

2020-08-03 Thread tom petch
FRom: Juergen Schoenwaelder Sent: 30 July 2020 14:47 To: Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar) Cc: Reshad Rahman (rrahman); tom petch; netmod@ietf.org; Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) Subject: Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses Thanks for pointing to the definitions in

Re: [netmod] identityref with multiple base statements

2020-08-03 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
Joey Boyd writes: > Hi, > > I am looking for some clarification regarding RFC 7950 section 9.10.2, > specifically this statement. > > Valid values for an identityref are any identities derived from all the > identityref's base identities. > > Example: > > identity base-1 { > description >