Thank you!
I just uploaded rev -06.
--- Alex
On 9/18/2020 12:47 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
>
>
> This addresses my comment/concern.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Reshad.
>
>
>
> *From: *Alexander L Clemm
> *Date: *Friday, September 18, 2020 at 3:43 PM
> *To: *"Reshad
Hi Alex,
This addresses my comment/concern.
Regards,
Reshad.
From: Alexander L Clemm
Date: Friday, September 18, 2020 at 3:43 PM
To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" , "yang-doct...@ietf.org"
Cc: "last-c...@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org"
, "draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff@ietf.org"
Subject: Re:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.
Title : Comparison of NMDA datastores
Authors : Alexander Clemm
Yingzhen Qu
Hi Reshad,
okay, so let's add the following then to section 4, in the explanation
of the "differences" output parameter:
"When a datastore node in the source of the comparison is not present in
the target of the comparison, this can be indicated either as a "delete"
or as a "remove" in the patch
Hi Alex,
I think the only “problem” with using both “remove” and “delete” is that it
could be confusing (when should one be used and not the other). Adding some
text to say they’re the same for the diff operation is good enough for me.
Regards,
Reshad.
From: Alexander L Clemm
Date: Tuesday,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 3:48 PM Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) <
jason.ste...@nokia.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> We have a practical problem though. YANG NEXT/2.0 is some indeterminate
> date in the future. Certainly measured in years (not months) and likely >2.
>
>
>
Actually, the main
