Thanks, Reshad and Yingzhen!
--- Alex
From: netmod On Behalf Of Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 9:42 AM
To: Yingzhen Qu ; Alexander L Clemm
; yang-doct...@ietf.org
Cc: last-c...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff@ietf.org;
netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod]
Hi Michal,
> Now, I believe there is some reason why "when" is forbidden for an "action"
> although I do not know what it is.
Note that Martin supports, and a room full of YANG-next-ers agreed to put it in
the "Definitely Dos (MUST Solve)" category.
Looks good, no new issues.
Regards,
Reshad.
From: Yingzhen Qu
Date: Friday, September 25, 2020 at 11:49 AM
To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" , Alexander L Clemm
, "yang-doct...@ietf.org"
Cc: "last-c...@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org"
, "draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff@ietf.org"
Subject: Re:
Hi Reshad,
Thanks for the link to verify JSON, it’s very helpful.
I’ve uploaded version -07. Please let me know if you have any comments.
Thanks,
Yingzhen
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)"
Date: Friday, September 25, 2020 at 8:34 AM
To: Yingzhen Qu , Alexander L Clemm
, "yang-doct...@ietf.org"
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.
Title : Comparison of NMDA datastores
Authors : Alexander Clemm
Yingzhen Qu
Hi Yingzhen,
The JSON example doesn’t seem ok because it only contains 1 edit entry. To
confirm I went to https://jsonlint.com/ and it 1st complained about missing
comma after the } for source-value and when I fixed that it complained about
Duplicate key ‘edit-id’.
FYI, the JSON block below
Hi Reshad,
Thank you for the example. I modified the XML example as you suggested. The
JSON example looks ok to me. Also fixed the nit to reference RFC 6991.
New generated txt file attached, please let me know if you see more issues.
Thanks,
Yingzhen
From: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)"
Date:
Hi Yingzhen,
Yes I believe this part is broken, since you have multiple edit-id elements for
1 edit element, below is the YANG snippet from RFC8072.
list edit {
key edit-id;
ordered-by user;
leaf edit-id {
type string;
From: Michal Vaško
Sent: 25 September 2020 12:18
On Friday, September 25, 2020 12:57 CEST, tom petch wrote:
> From: netmod on behalf of Michal Vaško
>
> Sent: 25 September 2020 11:18
>
> Hi,
> since no one replied am I to understand this is an unforeseen use-case? In
> that case there
On Friday, September 25, 2020 12:57 CEST, tom petch
wrote:
> From: netmod on behalf of Michal Vaško
>
> Sent: 25 September 2020 11:18
>
> Hi,
> since no one replied am I to understand this is an unforeseen use-case? In
> that case there could at least be an agreement on what the behavior
From: netmod on behalf of Michal Vaško
Sent: 25 September 2020 11:18
Hi,
since no one replied am I to understand this is an unforeseen use-case? In that
case there could at least be an agreement on what the behavior should be
because I want to know what to implement in our tools.
As it
Hi,
since no one replied am I to understand this is an unforeseen use-case? In that
case there could at least be an agreement on what the behavior should be
because I want to know what to implement in our tools.
Maybe at least warn about an unsupported use-case and ignore the "when" with
12 matches
Mail list logo
