On 24. Mar 2023, at 22:29, Jürgen Schönwälder
wrote:
>
> using '"(%.+)"' in the IP address types may be the most liberal answer
Pedantically speaking, no.
/./ does not include all of ASCII, which is not liberal enough if you want to
preserve the newlines in your interface names that are
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 08:31:28AM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 25-Mar-23 02:29, Jürgen Schönwälder wrote:
> > Rob,
> >
> > using '"(%.+)"' in the IP address types may be the most liberal answer
> > and in line with the interface YANG module. Applications using
> >
The NETMOD agenda has been updated:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/116/session/netmod
And produced in full below for convenience.
Kent (and Jason for putting it together!)
# Agenda/Materials for the NETMOD 116 WG Session
On 25-Mar-23 02:29, Jürgen Schönwälder wrote:
Rob,
using '"(%.+)"' in the IP address types may be the most liberal answer
and in line with the interface YANG module. Applications using
draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis will have to resort to %-encodings to deal
with forward slashes and the like, which
Rob,
using '"(%.+)"' in the IP address types may be the most liberal answer
and in line with the interface YANG module. Applications using
draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis will have to resort to %-encodings to deal
with forward slashes and the like, which likely is OK in the web
context.
I do not
