Re: [netmod] Joint WGLC on "semver" and "module-versioning" drafts

2023-06-04 Thread Jürgen Schönwälder
On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 07:01:16PM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote: > On 2023-06-02, at 18:37, Jürgen Schönwälder > wrote: > > > > I am not aware of an official authoritative source of YANG files. > > I’m not sure I understand the current discussion, but wouldn't > > curl -s

Re: [netmod] Joint WGLC on "semver" and "module-versioning" drafts

2023-06-04 Thread Carsten Bormann
On 2023-06-02, at 18:37, Jürgen Schönwälder wrote: > > I am not aware of an official authoritative source of YANG files. I’m not sure I understand the current discussion, but wouldn't curl -s https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9127.xml | xmlstarlet sel -T -t -v

Re: [netmod] Joint WGLC on "semver" and "module-versioning" drafts

2023-06-04 Thread Andy Bierman
On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 7:01 AM Kent Watsen wrote: > As an individual contributor and faithful YANG custodian, I cannot > support work that changes YANG-semantics without versioning YANG itself. > As Andy wrote before: > > The only correct way to remove MUST/MUST NOT from the "YANG contract"

Re: [netmod] Joint WGLC on "semver" and "module-versioning" drafts

2023-06-04 Thread Kent Watsen
As an individual contributor and faithful YANG custodian, I cannot support work that changes YANG-semantics without versioning YANG itself. As Andy wrote before: The only correct way to remove MUST/MUST NOT from the "YANG contract" is to introduce a new YANG language version (1.2),