Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8792 (6739)

Hi all, the same kind of mistake happended in section 8.1.2, too. Best regards, Erik On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 03:22:09AM +, Qin Wu wrote: > Good catch, Martin, > Agree the text should be corrected. > > -Qin > -邮件原件- > 发件人: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org] >

Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: inet:host

Hi, On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 10:36:17AM +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 01:46:38PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > On 22. 07. 20 13:00, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > > > > > my understanding is that Lada is now proposing something slightly > > > different but I

Re: [netmod] rfc6991bis: loopback addresses

Hello Reshad, while the I-D draft-nainar-mpls-lsp-ping-yang-00 only specifies ::1/128 as IPv6 loopback address, RFC 8029 sections 2.1., 3.4.1.1.1., and 4.3. specify to use the IPv4 loopback range as IP4-mapped IPv6 addresses for IPv6 MPLS echo request UDP packets, not the IPv6 loopback address

Re: [netmod] optional char in yang-semver

Hi all, On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:16:52PM +, Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) wrote: > An update on this. We had further discussions on the weekly revision call > just now. Thanks to an interesting new suggestion from Jan L. we're changing > tack on our favorite "extra indicators". > >

Re: [netmod] rfcstrip does not work on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-12

Hi all, On 31.03.20 09:36, Carsten Bormann wrote: On 2020-03-31, at 09:22, Carsten Bormann wrote: On 2020-03-31, at 01:47, Kent Watsen wrote: I thought someone said that `xml2rfc` was going to support a “markers” attribute for the element, but I don’t see that here yet:

Re: [netmod] Where can I use ? - rfcstrip

Hi, On 30.03.20 18:10, Balázs Lengyel wrote: > From: Kent Watsen > > [...] > > All The extracted files (including the two that are NOT folded) > > contain a ‘^@‘ character at the EOF. This must be something > > introduced by `rfcstrip` because `rfcfold` does a simple file-level > > copy when

Re: [netmod] rfcstrip does not work on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-12

Hi Kent, Balázs, On 27.03.20 19:15, Kent Watsen wrote: On Mar 27, 2020, at 1:36 PM, Balázs Lengyel wrote: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-12 contains a section with . Looking at -12, I see

Re: [netmod] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hello Benjamin, On 10.01.20 00:28, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote: Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-11: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC

Re: [netmod] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Ben, comments regarding just the security considerations below. On 11.09.19 02:03, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 10:02:03PM +, Kent Watsen wrote: On Sep 5, 2019, at 2:07 AM, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote: [...] Section 10 We should warn against implementations

Re: [netmod] Alissa Cooper's Abstain on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Martin, On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:17:30PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Kent Watsen wrote: > > > > >> There has been discussion about how embedding YANG models in RFCs seems > > >> like a > > >> poor fit for a number of reasons. By standardizing line-folding > > >> mechanisms and > >

Re: [netmod] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Benjamin, On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 11:07:46PM -0700, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote: > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: Discuss > [...] > -- > COMMENT: >

Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Adam, please see below (inline). On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 05:34:19PM -0700, Adam Roach via Datatracker wrote: > Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: No Objection > [...] >

Re: [netmod] Last Call: (Handling Long Lines in Inclusions in Internet-Drafts and RFCs) to Best Current Practice

Hi Paul, I'll try to elaborate on my understanding of "forced folding" below: On 02.08.19 02:08, Paul Kyzivat wrote: On 7/31/19 3:41 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: [...] 2) Regarding forced folding in section 8.2.1: step 1 (Determine where the fold will occur) could benefit from some elaboration

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-06.txt

Hi, whilst missing the original IPR poll [1], as a recently acknowledged contributor: No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/s1TKbSLXvlJG8Q9MgqFm4197r88 Thanks, Erik On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:35:28PM +, Kent