Dear all, Agree with Lada and Juergen, regarding quantifying the changes and the time frame.
Thank you, Tina On Jul 29, 2015, at 6:35 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de<mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de>> wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 11:49:01AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de<mailto:j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de>> writes: Lada, there won't be any decision as long as there is not a concrete actionable proposal to be discussed. Such a proposal does not have to be 'complete rewrite' but it needs to be a detailed list of what would have to change so that it is possible to assess such a proposal. This is still quite some work, so I'd first like to see an elementary consensus that it is a good thing to do now. I think the WG needs to see a half way complete list of changes that this implies in order to form an opinion, something like 'section X needs to be rewritten', 'section X needs to be split into A and B', 'section X does not require any changes' etc. Unless we have an outline of how much work this is, we simply do not know what we are talking about. Clearly it would mean further delay for 6020bis and all other documents that depend on it. And frankly - I need to show my employer that at least some of my IETF work ever gets finished. I agree. If such a reorganization costs say more of four additional weeks, I have a hard time to like it. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
