Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5663)

2019-03-29 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Ebben Aries wrote: > On Mar 19 23:27 PM, Robert Varga wrote: > > On 19/03/2019 19:12, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: > > > Hi Ebben, > > > > > > I've always taken the ABNF to list the definitive sub-statements that are > > > allowed for the various deviate "add", "replace", or "delete" options.

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5663)

2019-03-19 Thread Robert Varga
On 19/03/2019 19:12, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: > Hi Ebben, > > I've always taken the ABNF to list the definitive sub-statements that are > allowed for the various deviate "add", "replace", or "delete" options. > Perhaps the RFC could state this more explicitly. Perhaps raise an issue on >

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5663)

2019-03-19 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
.@watsen.net; lber...@labn.net Cc: rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org; netmod@ietf.org Subject: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5663) The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950, "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language". -- You

[netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5663)

2019-03-18 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950, "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language". -- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5663 -- Type: Technical Reported by: Ebben