Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

2020-09-25 Thread Alexander Clemm
] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04 Looks good, no new issues. Regards, Reshad. From: Yingzhen Qu mailto:yingzhen...@futurewei.com>> Date: Friday, September 25, 2020 at 11:49 AM To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" mailto:rrah...@cisco.com>&g

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

2020-09-25 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
-netmod-nmda-diff....@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] [netmod] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04 Hi Reshad, Thanks for the link to verify JSON, it’s very helpful. I’ve uploaded version -07. Please let me know if you have any comments. Thanks, Yingzhen From:

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

2020-09-25 Thread Yingzhen Qu
oct...@ietf.org" Cc: "last-c...@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff....@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] [netmod] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04 Hi Yingzhen, The JSON example doesn’t seem ok be

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

2020-09-25 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
"ietf-interface:interface/description": "ip interface" } } ] } } } } From: Yingzhen Qu Date: Friday, September 25, 2020 at 10:47 AM To: "

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

2020-09-25 Thread Yingzhen Qu
uot; Date: Friday, September 25, 2020 at 4:58 AM To: Yingzhen Qu , Alexander L Clemm , "yang-doct...@ietf.org" Cc: "last-c...@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff....@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] [netmod] Yangdoctors last

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

2020-09-25 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
reference to 6991 (as 6021 is obsoleted). Regards, Reshad. From: Alexander L Clemm Date: Friday, September 18, 2020 at 3:48 PM To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" , "yang-doct...@ietf.org" Cc: "last-c...@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-netmod-nmda

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

2020-09-24 Thread Yingzhen Qu
ptember 22, 2020 at 6:07 AM To: Alexander L Clemm , "yang-doct...@ietf.org" Cc: "last-c...@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff....@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] [netmod] Yangdoctors last call review of d

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

2020-09-22 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
.org" , "netmod@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] [netmod] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04 Thank you! I just uploaded rev -06. --- Alex On 9/18/2020 12:47 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) wrote: Hi Al

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

2020-09-18 Thread Alexander L Clemm
iday, September 18, 2020 at 3:43 PM > *To: *"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" , > "yang-doct...@ietf.org" > *Cc: *"last-c...@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org" > , "draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff....@ietf.org" > > *Subject: *Re: [yang-doctors

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

2020-09-18 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
-netmod-nmda-diff....@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] [netmod] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04 Hi Reshad, okay, so let's add the following then to section 4, in the explanation of the "differences" output parameter: "When a datastore n

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

2020-09-18 Thread Alexander L Clemm
L Clemm > *Date: *Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 7:31 PM > *To: *"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" , > "yang-doct...@ietf.org" > *Cc: *"last-c...@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org" > , "draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff@ietf.org" >

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

2020-09-18 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
, September 15, 2020 at 7:31 PM To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" , "yang-doct...@ietf.org" Cc: "last-c...@ietf.org" , "netmod@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff....@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] [netmod] Yangdoctors last call review o

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

2020-09-15 Thread Alexander L Clemm
Hi Reshad, re: question 1: As you indicate, there may be no distinction between indicating a "remove" or a "delete" in the patch.  Right now it would be acceptable to return either.  If we want to eliminate this freedom, which one would you prefer be used?  Shall we remove the possibility for

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

2020-09-15 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
Hi Alex, I will review the latest version. See below for questions/responses. On 2020-09-15, 5:19 PM, "yang-doctors on behalf of Alexander L Clemm" wrote: Hello Reshad, hello YANG Doctors, thank you for your review! Please find my replies inline, . We have also just posted

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

2020-09-15 Thread Alexander L Clemm
Hello Reshad, hello YANG Doctors, thank you for your review!  Please find my replies inline, .  We have also just posted -05 (thanks, Yingzhen, for doublechecking my updates).    --- Alex on behalf of coauthors On 9/7/2020 7:06 AM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) wrote: > > > Review of rev -04 by

Re: [netmod] [yang-doctors] Yangdoctors last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-nmda-diff-04

2020-09-07 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
Review of rev -04 by Reshad Rahman The document is clear and well-written. While some issues have been identified, they can be resolved quickly. Issues 1. YANG model P8, for “leaf xpath-filter”, add reference to RFC6021. There should also be a normative reference to RFC6021 (as