Re: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module

2015-10-21 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 05:28:20PM -0400, David Reid wrote: > > > > Why does yang 1.1 add the new requirement that a server MUST NOT implement > > more than 1 revision? If there is an e-mail thread, you can point me at that > >

Re: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module

2015-10-20 Thread David Reid
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:49:02AM -0400, David Reid wrote: > > > >I'm reviewing 6020bis since it is in working group last call. > > > >I see a new requirement that a server MUST NOT implement > > > >more than one revision of a module. I understand that supporting > > > >more than one revision

Re: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module

2015-10-14 Thread David Reid
> >I'm reviewing 6020bis since it is in working group last call. > >I see a new requirement that a server MUST NOT implement > >more than one revision of a module. I understand that supporting > >more than one revision can cause problems, but I expect that > >it will happen in practice. I know it

Re: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module

2015-10-14 Thread Andy Bierman
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:24 AM, David Reid wrote: > > There seems to be 3 solutions, none of which are very good: > > > > 1) document everything: return lots of > > instance-level conformance information and expect the client > > to sort it out > > > > 2) Advertise the newer

Re: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module

2015-10-14 Thread David Reid
> There seems to be 3 solutions, none of which are very good: > > 1) document everything: return lots of > instance-level conformance information and expect the client > to sort it out > > 2) Advertise the newer version and let the client figure out > that some instances only allow 1 - 10 > >

Re: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module

2015-10-13 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:55:32PM -0700, Randy Presuhn wrote: > Hi - > > >From: David Reid <r...@snmp.com> > >Sent: Oct 9, 2015 2:03 PM > >To: netmod@ietf.org > >Subject: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module > > > >I'm reviewin

Re: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module

2015-10-13 Thread Randy Presuhn
Hi - >From: David Reid <r...@snmp.com> >Sent: Oct 9, 2015 2:03 PM >To: netmod@ietf.org >Subject: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module > >I'm reviewing 6020bis since it is in working group last call. >I see a new requirement that a server MUST NOT implem

Re: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module

2015-10-13 Thread Randy Presuhn
Hi - >From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> >Sent: Oct 13, 2015 1:06 PM >To: Randy Presuhn <randy_pres...@mindspring.com> >Cc: netmod@ietf.org >Subject: Re: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module > >On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 a

Re: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module

2015-10-13 Thread Andy Bierman
>Cc: netmod@ietf.org > >Subject: Re: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module > > > >On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:55:32PM -0700, Randy Presuhn wrote: > >> Hi - > >> > >> >From: David Reid <r...@snmp.com> > >> >Sent

[netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module

2015-10-09 Thread David Reid
I'm reviewing 6020bis since it is in working group last call. I see a new requirement that a server MUST NOT implement more than one revision of a module. I understand that supporting more than one revision can cause problems, but I expect that it will happen in practice. I know it happens