Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 05:28:20PM -0400, David Reid wrote:
> >
> > Why does yang 1.1 add the new requirement that a server MUST NOT implement
> > more than 1 revision? If there is an e-mail thread, you can point me at that
> >
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:49:02AM -0400, David Reid wrote:
> > > >I'm reviewing 6020bis since it is in working group last call.
> > > >I see a new requirement that a server MUST NOT implement
> > > >more than one revision of a module. I understand that supporting
> > > >more than one revision
> >I'm reviewing 6020bis since it is in working group last call.
> >I see a new requirement that a server MUST NOT implement
> >more than one revision of a module. I understand that supporting
> >more than one revision can cause problems, but I expect that
> >it will happen in practice. I know it
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 8:24 AM, David Reid wrote:
> > There seems to be 3 solutions, none of which are very good:
> >
> > 1) document everything: return lots of
> > instance-level conformance information and expect the client
> > to sort it out
> >
> > 2) Advertise the newer
> There seems to be 3 solutions, none of which are very good:
>
> 1) document everything: return lots of
> instance-level conformance information and expect the client
> to sort it out
>
> 2) Advertise the newer version and let the client figure out
> that some instances only allow 1 - 10
>
>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:55:32PM -0700, Randy Presuhn wrote:
> Hi -
>
> >From: David Reid <r...@snmp.com>
> >Sent: Oct 9, 2015 2:03 PM
> >To: netmod@ietf.org
> >Subject: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module
> >
> >I'm reviewin
Hi -
>From: David Reid <r...@snmp.com>
>Sent: Oct 9, 2015 2:03 PM
>To: netmod@ietf.org
>Subject: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module
>
>I'm reviewing 6020bis since it is in working group last call.
>I see a new requirement that a server MUST NOT implem
Hi -
>From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de>
>Sent: Oct 13, 2015 1:06 PM
>To: Randy Presuhn <randy_pres...@mindspring.com>
>Cc: netmod@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module
>
>On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 a
>Cc: netmod@ietf.org
> >Subject: Re: [netmod] 6020bis more than one revision of a module
> >
> >On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:55:32PM -0700, Randy Presuhn wrote:
> >> Hi -
> >>
> >> >From: David Reid <r...@snmp.com>
> >> >Sent
I'm reviewing 6020bis since it is in working group last call.
I see a new requirement that a server MUST NOT implement
more than one revision of a module. I understand that supporting
more than one revision can cause problems, but I expect that
it will happen in practice. I know it happens
10 matches
Mail list logo