Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-17 Thread Robert Wilton
On 17/01/2016 09:52, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 03:38:00PM +, Robert Wilton wrote: Since an ID is effectively superseded by any new versions, I think that it is useful if a module defined in an ID has a revision date that matches the published ID, and also a

Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-17 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 03:38:00PM +, Robert Wilton wrote: > > Since an ID is effectively superseded by any new versions, I think that > it is useful if a module defined in an ID has a revision date that > matches the published ID, and also a reference back to the ID version > that defines

Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-15 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
> On 15 Jan 2016, at 12:49, Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:39:16PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >> Does this solve any practical problem? Modules are imported based on >> the module name and revision. On the other hand,

Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-15 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:39:16PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > Does this solve any practical problem? Modules are imported based on > the module name and revision. On the other hand, it does create new problems: > namespace URIs and their mappings to prefixes may be spread in many > places

Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-15 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
> On 15 Jan 2016, at 15:16, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:39 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Andy Bierman writes: > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, t.petch wrote: > > > >> - Original

Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-15 Thread Andy Bierman
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 15 Jan 2016, at 12:49, Juergen Schoenwaelder < > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:39:16PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> > >> Does this solve any practical problem?

Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-15 Thread Andy Bierman
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 15 Jan 2016, at 15:10, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > > > On 15 Jan 2016, at 12:49, Juergen Schoenwaelder < >

Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-15 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
> On 15 Jan 2016, at 15:10, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 15 Jan 2016, at 12:49, Juergen Schoenwaelder > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at

Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-15 Thread Andy Bierman
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:39 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Andy Bierman writes: > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, t.petch wrote: > > > >> - Original Message - > >> From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder"

Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-15 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
> On 15 Jan 2016, at 15:49, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 15 Jan 2016, at 15:10, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Ladislav Lhotka

Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-15 Thread Robert Wilton
On 15/01/2016 15:20, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: On 15 Jan 2016, at 15:49, Andy Bierman wrote: On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: On 15 Jan 2016, at 15:10, Andy Bierman wrote: On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:55 AM,

Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-14 Thread t . petch
- Original Message - From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder" To: "Martin Bjorklund" Cc: Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 10:48 AM > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:21:43AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Juergen Schoenwaelder

Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-14 Thread Andy Bierman
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, t.petch wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder" > To: "Martin Bjorklund" > Cc: > Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 10:48 AM > > > On Mon,

Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-11 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:15:26AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Currently, 6087bis says that standards-track, published and > > unpublished modules SHOULD use the URN prefix > > "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:".

Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-11 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:15:26AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Hi, > > Currently, 6087bis says that standards-track, published and > unpublished modules SHOULD use the URN prefix > "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:". > > There are two issues with this: > > 1. We already publish experimental

[netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-11 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Hi, Currently, 6087bis says that standards-track, published and unpublished modules SHOULD use the URN prefix "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:". There are two issues with this: 1. We already publish experimental modules w/ this prefix. (ietf-netconf-time and ietf-complex-types). So

Re: [netmod] 6087bis namespace recommendations

2016-01-11 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:21:43AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:15:26AM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Currently, 6087bis says that standards-track, published and > > >