[As an individual contributor]
Hi Andy,
Please see [RW] inline
From: Andy Bierman
Sent: 31 March 2020 17:20
To: Kent Watsen
Cc: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; Martin Björklund
; netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label
statements
On Tue, Mar 31
[As a contributor]
Hi Kent,
Please see [RW] inline
From: Kent Watsen
Sent: 31 March 2020 16:37
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Cc: Andy Bierman ; Martin Björklund ;
netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label
statements
[replying to Reshad as well]
Hi
From: netmod on behalf of Andy Bierman
Sent: 31 March 2020 17:19
Agreeing with Andy that BC/NBC is a bad idea but from a different standpoint.
In general the concept sounds great but turning it into an unambiguous, usable
by engineers test is mostly impossible as a number of discussions
NBC change but
> users should look just in case).
>
>
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> *From:* Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2020 12:04 PM
> *To:* Ivory, William ; mbj+i...@4668.se;
> Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
> *Cc:* netmod@ietf.org
> *Subject
indication.
Jason
From: Andy Bierman
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 6:15 PM
To: Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Cc: Martin Björklund ; netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label
statements
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 2:57 PM Sterne, Jason (Nokia
son (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 12:42 PM
To: Reshad Rahman (rrahman) ; Ivory, William
; mbj+i...@4668.se
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label
statements
The idea is that following down a chain of YANG versions of a modul
ste...@nokia.com>"
mailto:jason.ste...@nokia.com>>, "Reshad Rahman
(rrahman)" mailto:rrah...@cisco.com>>
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>"
mailto:netmod@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label
stat
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:37 AM Kent Watsen wrote:
> [replying to Reshad as well]
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> My impression is that Semver 2.0.0 works fine if you can always force
> clients to move to the latest version of the API whenever any bugfixes are
> made to the API (whether they are BC or NBC).
Ivory, William"
Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2020 at 3:40 AM
To: "mbj+i...@4668.se" , "jason.ste...@nokia.com"
, "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)"
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label
statements
Apologies if thi
[replying to Reshad as well]
Hi Rob,
> My impression is that Semver 2.0.0 works fine if you can always force clients
> to move to the latest version of the API whenever any bugfixes are made to
> the API (whether they are BC or NBC). This is a natural fit for open source
> projects, but not
: NetMod WG
Subject: Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label
statements
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:20 AM Martin Björklund
mailto:mbj%2bi...@4668.se>> wrote:
"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" mailto:rrah...@cisco.com>> wrote:
> On 2020-03-28, 4
;
On Behalf Of Martin Björklund
> > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 4:40 PM
> > To: rrah...@cisco.com<mailto:rrah...@cisco.com>
> > Cc: netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
> > Subject: Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-labe
On 2020-03-30, 7:22 PM, "Kent Watsen" wrote:
> Even though we are debating/discussing whether iETF moduels should use
YANG semver (aka modified semver), please note that there is interest from
other publishers of YANG modules to use semver or YANG semver.
Details?
I was
> Even though we are debating/discussing whether iETF moduels should use YANG
> semver (aka modified semver), please note that there is interest from other
> publishers of YANG modules to use semver or YANG semver.
Details?
> Regarding your comment below, is it specific to IETF modules or
e: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label
statements
[I’ve scanned the entire thread before circling back to respond to this message]
Martin writes:
I can reluctantly accept that modified smever is published as
Experimental. But that doesn't mean that IETF modules should u
[I’ve scanned the entire thread before circling back to respond to this message]
> Martin writes:
> I can reluctantly accept that modified smever is published as
> Experimental. But that doesn't mean that IETF modules should use it.
I assume Martin’s reference to Experimental follows my
)
> > Cc: rrah...@cisco.com; netmod@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label
> > statements
> >
> > "Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" wrote:
> > > > But it is not true. What happened between 1.0.
rtin Björklund
> > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 4:40 PM
> > To: rrah...@cisco.com
> > Cc: netmod@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label
> > statements
> >
> > "Reshad Rahman (rrah
Please see inline
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Björklund
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 5:51 PM
> To: Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
> Cc: rrah...@cisco.com; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label
> st
m that point onwards in that
> branch.
/martin
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: netmod On Behalf Of Martin Björklund
> > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 4:40 PM
> > To: rrah...@cisco.com
> > Cc: netmod@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG mo
ook up
what that means".
Jason
From: netmod On Behalf Of Andy Bierman
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 4:46 PM
To: Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
Cc: NetMod WG
Subject: Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label
statements
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 1:26 PM Reshad Rahman (rrahma
Original Message-
> From: netmod On Behalf Of Martin Björklund
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 4:40 PM
> To: rrah...@cisco.com
> Cc: netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label
> statements
>
> "Reshad Rahman (rra
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 1:26 PM Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
wrote:
>
>
> *From: *'Andy Bierman'
> *Date: *Monday, March 30, 2020 at 2:51 PM
> *To: *Martin Björklund
> *Cc: *"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" , NetMod WG <
> netmod@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [ne
"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote:
>
> On 2020-03-30, 2:20 PM, "Martin Björklund" wrote:
>
> "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote:
> > On 2020-03-28, 4:41 AM, "Martin Björklund" wrote:
> >
> > "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
From: 'Andy Bierman'
Date: Monday, March 30, 2020 at 2:51 PM
To: Martin Björklund
Cc: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" , NetMod WG
Subject: Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label
statements
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:20 AM Martin Björklund
mailto:mbj%2bi.
On 2020-03-30, 2:20 PM, "Martin Björklund" wrote:
"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote:
> On 2020-03-28, 4:41 AM, "Martin Björklund" wrote:
>
> "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/45
>
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:20 AM Martin Björklund wrote:
> "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote:
> > On 2020-03-28, 4:41 AM, "Martin Björklund" wrote:
> >
> > "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/45
> > >
> >
"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote:
> On 2020-03-28, 4:41 AM, "Martin Björklund" wrote:
>
> "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/45
> >
> > o 7.1
> >
> > The text says:
>
On 2020-03-28, 4:41 AM, "Martin Björklund" wrote:
"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/45
>
> o 7.1
>
> The text says:
>
> All IETF YANG modules MUST
"Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/45
>
> o 7.1
>
> The text says:
>
> All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label statements for
> all
> newly published YANG
Hi,
https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/45
o 7.1
The text says:
All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label statements for all
newly published YANG modules, and all newly published revisions of
existing
31 matches
Mail list logo
