Hi Qin,
Thanks for the interesting and fruitful discussion.
The most important next step in my opinion is to agree on how we model PVs.
Specifically,
1. How the client can configure a PV of a known type (defined in a YANG model
supported by the server);
2. How the client
Hi, Igor:
Thank for your clarification, please see my follow up comments.
发件人: Igor Bryskin [mailto:i_brys...@yahoo.com]
发送时间: 2019年11月6日 23:04
收件人: netmod@ietf.org; draft-bryskin-netconf-automation-y...@ietf.org; Lou
Berger ; Qin Wu
抄送: draft-wwx-netmod-event-y...@ietf.org
主题: Re: I-D Action:
Hi Qin,
[ snipped]
.
1.The Expression clause in an ECA could be very complex and hence requires a
complex syntax to articulate. To address this in our contribution
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bryskin-netconf-automation-yang/) we
proposed two methods:
a) When
Hi, Igor
发件人: Igor Bryskin [mailto:i_brys...@yahoo.com]
发送时间: 2019年11月5日 22:02
收件人: netmod@ietf.org; draft-bryskin-netconf-automation-y...@ietf.org; Lou
Berger ; Qin Wu
抄送: draft-wwx-netmod-event-y...@ietf.org
主题: Re: I-D Action: draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-04.txt
Hi Qin,
Good discussion.
Hi Qin,
Good discussion. Please, see in-line.
Igor
On Tuesday, November 5, 2019, 3:09:53 AM EST, Qin Wu
wrote:
Hi, Igor:
发件人: Igor Bryskin [mailto:i_brys...@yahoo.com]
发送时间: 2019年11月5日 3:06
收件人: Qin Wu ; netmod@ietf.org;
draft-bryskin-netconf-automation-y...@ietf.org; Lou Berger
Hi, Igor:
发件人: Igor Bryskin [mailto:i_brys...@yahoo.com]
发送时间: 2019年11月5日 3:06
收件人: Qin Wu ; netmod@ietf.org;
draft-bryskin-netconf-automation-y...@ietf.org; Lou Berger
抄送: draft-wwx-netmod-event-y...@ietf.org
主题: Re: I-D Action: draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-04.txt
Hi Qin,
Thanks for the
Hi Qin,
Thanks for the effort.
My general question is what is the ultimate objective/ambition of this work?
Is it
1. Modeling the imperative policy style network automation as stipulated by the
SUPA framework
or
2. Event scoping of PUSH machinery
If 2. is the case, it would
Qin,
Thanks for the update.
To answer your question as well as respond to the related thread, as
chair, I generally think it best to adopt once there is consensus in the
WG on a direction to take with respect to the topic covered by a draft.
That is not to say that a fully formed or
v-04 is posted to address chairs' comments,
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-04
the main changes include:
o Add text in introduction section to clarify the usage examples of
ECA policy
o Update objective section to align with use cases.
o Clarify
