Hi,
comments inline.
On 27.02.24 16:11, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
> Yes possibly. Florian would you be interested in helping if we were to do
> that?
Yes, of course! Let me know how I can help with that.
> *From: *Scott Mansfield
> *Date: *Tuesday, 27 February 2024 at 14:16
> *To: *Rob
Yes possibly. Florian would you be interested in helping if we were to do that?
Regards,
Rob
From: Scott Mansfield
Date: Tuesday, 27 February 2024 at 14:16
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) , Florian Kauer
, netmod@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Modeling of veth pairs
Could we add this case to the intf-ext
Could we add this case to the intf-ext work?
We could use this as an example. If a new module is what is desired, I will
support that too.
Regards,
-scott.
From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 8:55 AM
To: Florian Kauer ; netmod@ietf.org
Cc: Scott Mansfield
Subject:
Hi Florian,
Some very quick thoughts on this:
I’m assuming that these Virtual Ethernet interfaces are really only Ethernet
emulations at layer 2 rather than layer 1. I.e., I presume that there is no
configuration for speed, duplex, flow-control, etc? But they would each have
their own a MAC
Hi,
I would like to model a veth pair in YANG, preferrably without proprietary
models.
In Linux, these veth pairs are basically just this:
+--+ +--+
|Socket| |Socket|
+--+ +--+
