Robert Wilton wrote:
[...]
> Personally, I really dislike the implicit delete behaviour of when
> statements in steps (2) and (3) because I think that it adds a lot of
> unnecessarily complexity in the processing, and has a very surprising
> interaction with NACM. I would much rather that the c
Robert Wilton wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> The Cisco email security filter has somewhat mangled the URLs in your
> message, but my thoughts below ...
>
> On 02/05/2018 16:21, Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've seen some older threads about 'when' handling and they en
Hi Jason,
The Cisco email security filter has somewhat mangled the URLs in your
message, but my thoughts below ...
On 02/05/2018 16:21, Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) wrote:
Hi all,
I've seen some older threads about 'when' handling and they ended up
creating a lot of debate about behav
Hi all,
I've seen some older threads about 'when' handling and they ended up creating a
lot of debate about behavior & intentions (and about how well the text is
written in the specs).
I'm hoping that the community out there is in agreement on yes vs no for the
questions below.
Given the foll
