Agree that ideally we avoid (a) in running. Unfortunately I think we used (a)
in ietf-interfaces though:
leaf type {
type identityref {
base interface-type;
}
mandatory true;
description
"The type of the interface.
Oscar González de Dios wrote:
>
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Martin Bjorklund
> Enviado el: martes, 11 de febrero de 2020 11:00
> Para: Oscar González de Dios
> CC: ops...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
> Asunto: Re: [netmod] Question on how to design a Yang model to reflect
>
-Mensaje original-
De: Martin Bjorklund
Enviado el: martes, 11 de febrero de 2020 11:00
Para: Oscar González de Dios
CC: ops...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
Asunto: Re: [netmod] Question on how to design a Yang model to reflect
auto-asignment of a give leaf
Hi,
Oscar González de Dios
Hi,
Oscar González de Dios wrote:
> Dear OPSAWG and Netmod colleagues,
>
> During last IETF Opsawg meeting we raised a question (and
> there was some discussion during the meeting) that we have
> found yet no good answer and we would like to
Isnt it possible to handle case b) by defining a value to have the meaning
no value has been assigned and then the user an explicitly set that value?
Adrian
From: netmod On Behalf Of Oscar González de Dios
Sent: 11 February 2020 02:40
To: ops...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
Subject:
Dear OPSAWG and Netmod colleagues,
During last IETF Opsawg meeting we raised a question (and there
was some discussion during the meeting) that we have found yet no good answer
and we would like to discuss it with operations and Yang experts.
The use case is the
