Re: [netmod] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18

Thanks, Andy! On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Kathleen Moriarty > wrote: >> >> Thanks for your review, Stephen! >> >> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Stephen Farrell >>

Re: [netmod] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18

On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Kathleen Moriarty < kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your review, Stephen! > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Stephen Farrell > wrote: > > Reviewer: Stephen Farrell > > Review result: Ready > > > > > > I reviewed

Re: [netmod] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18

Thanks for your review, Stephen! On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > Reviewer: Stephen Farrell > Review result: Ready > > > I reviewed the diff between -18 and RFC6087. [1] > >[1] >

[netmod] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18

Reviewer: Stephen Farrell Review result: Ready I reviewed the diff between -18 and RFC6087. [1] [1] https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc6087=draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18 I assume the security ADs were involved already in discussion about the new security considerations template in