Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-05.txt

Andy, Robert Wilton wrote: Hi, I have one question related to "5.1. Module Naming Conventions". Currently, the YANG modules that I have included as part of my individual IDs don't currently use an "ietf-" prefix because the drafts haven't been adopted as WG documents yet.

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-05.txt

Martin Bjorklund writes: > Andy Bierman wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I updated the YANG guidelines draft. > > I have a couple of comments. > > -- > > Section 5.14 says: > > The "choice" statement is allowed to be directly present within a

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-05.txt

Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Martin Bjorklund writes: > > > Andy Bierman wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I updated the YANG guidelines draft. > > > > I have a couple of comments. > > > > -- > > > > Section 5.14 says: > > > >

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-05.txt

Andy Bierman je 20.10.2015 ob 3:41 napisal: Hi, I updated the YANG guidelines draft. All open issues have been addressed in this version. https://github.com/netmod-wg/rfc6087bis/issues You missed this: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg13593.html Applies to both YANG

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-05.txt

> On 21 Oct 2015, at 09:17, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Martin Bjorklund writes: >> >>> Andy Bierman wrote: Hi, I updated the YANG guidelines draft. >>> >>> I have a couple of

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-05.txt

Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 21 Oct 2015, at 09:17, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> Martin Bjorklund writes: > >> > >>> Andy Bierman wrote: > Hi, > > I updated

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-05.txt

Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 21 Oct 2015, at 09:50, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> > >>> On 21 Oct 2015, at 09:17, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >>> > >>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-05.txt

> On 21 Oct 2015, at 09:50, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 21 Oct 2015, at 09:17, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>> >>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote: Martin Bjorklund writes: >

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-05.txt

> On 21 Oct 2015, at 10:13, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 21 Oct 2015, at 09:50, Martin Bjorklund wrote: >>> >>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > On 21 Oct 2015, at 09:17, Martin Bjorklund

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-05.txt

Robert Wilton wrote: > Hi, > > I have one question related to "5.1. Module Naming Conventions". > > Currently, the YANG modules that I have included as part of my > individual IDs don't currently use an "ietf-" prefix because the > drafts haven't been adopted as WG documents

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-05.txt

Andy Bierman wrote: > Hi, > > I updated the YANG guidelines draft. I have a couple of comments. -- Section 5.14 says: The "choice" statement is allowed to be directly present within a "case" statement in YANG 1.1. It is allowed in YANG 1

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-05.txt

Hi, I have one question related to "5.1. Module Naming Conventions". Currently, the YANG modules that I have included as part of my individual IDs don't currently use an "ietf-" prefix because the drafts haven't been adopted as WG documents yet. However, this means that the pyang tool