> -Original Message-
> From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
>
> Sent: giovedì 16 novembre 2023 10:33
> To: Kent Watsen ; Jason Sterne (Nokia)
> ; Jürgen Schönwälder
> ; netmod@ietf.org; Rob Wilton
> (rwilton)
> Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis: must + error-
> Objet : Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis: must + error-
> message for "config false"
>
> I think an important piece is missing here is, namely _who_ is doing
> the validation and who is in charge of keeping things valid. For
> config data, the server has the ta
lot of
> > "must" statements in state models. We could consider discouraging
> > them? (but we need to continue *allowing* them).
> > >>
> > >> Jason
> > >>
> > >>> -Original Message-
> > >>> From: netmod On
n)
>
> Objet : Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis: must + error-
> message for "config false"
>
> My confusion, sorry, I was thinking "mandatory".
>
> Must statements on opstate are useful, but less important.
>
> Kent
>
>
> &
t; need to continue *allowing* them).
>>
>> Jason
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: netmod On Behalf Of Rob Wilton
>>> (rwilton)
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 5:17 AM
>>> To: Jürgen Schönwälder ;
>>> mohamed.
...@orange.com; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis: must + error-message
> for "config false"
>
>
> CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking
> links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for addit
UST NOT be violated, including hierarchical
>> organization, identifiers, and type-based constraints. If a node in
>>does not meet the syntactic constraints, then it
>> MUST NOT be returned, and some other mechanism should be used to
>> flag
>> the error.
>>
>
etmod On Behalf Of Rob Wilton
> (rwilton)
> Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 5:17 AM
> To: Jürgen Schönwälder ;
> mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
> Cc: netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis: must + error-message
> for "config false"
>
>
or.
Regards,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: netmod On Behalf Of Jürgen Schönwälder
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 7:46 AM
To: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis: must + error-message for
"config false"
Here is what RFC
Here is what RFC 7950 says:
7.5.4.1. The "error-message" Statement
The "error-message" statement, which is optional, takes a string as
an argument. If the constraint evaluates to "false", the string is
passed as in the in NETCONF.
Since state data is not (directly) modified
-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
发送时间: 2023年10月31日 18:40
收件人: netmod@ietf.org
主题: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis: must + error-message for "config
false"
Hi all,
In the context of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang/,
Dhruv has received i
Hi all,
In the context of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang/,
Dhruv has received in the past a comment about the use of "must +
error-message" for "config false" data nodes. He reported that comment at
12 matches
Mail list logo
