Hi Rob,
The intent was to deconflict with LSR WG (meeting right after us)
and thought starting 4 hours later was pushing it too late for Asia.
Joel, is on PT agreed - although I'm sure he'd prefer later.
WG,
If the time is problematic for you and you expect to present/actively
Hi Lou,
Some folks have previously complained about other meetings starting so early:
11 am UTC = 4 am San Jose = 7 pm Beijing
Just to double check that you are happy with a 4 am start for any West Coast
based folks, perhaps there are not many of them involved in Netmod.
Thanks,
Rob
>
delete the one that does not map to 1100 UTC...
On 3/26/2020 12:06 PM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
There has been a suggestion to list all the meetings in UTC, so I've changed
this request to 12:00 UTC.
Okay?
I've noticed two requests for the same time, presumably the second one can just
be
There has been a suggestion to list all the meetings in UTC, so I've changed
this request to 12:00 UTC.
Okay?
I've noticed two requests for the same time, presumably the second one can just
be deleted?
Thanks,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
>
A new interim meeting request has just been submitted by Lou Berger.
This request requires approval by the Area Director of the Operations and
Management Area
The meeting can be approved here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim/request/interim-2020-netmod-01
A new interim meeting request has just been submitted by Lou Berger.
This request requires approval by the Area Director of the Operations and
Management Area
The meeting can be approved here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim/request/interim-2020-netmod-02
UPDATE
The NETMOD chairs just updated this request to occur 1-hour earlier to
deconflict with LSR.
We will send a Calendar ICS file shortly.
NETMOD Chairs
> On Mar 26, 2020, at 11:50 AM, IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
> wrote:
>
>
> A new interim meeting request has just been
