Re: [netmod] posted: draft-kwatsen-netmod-opstate-00

Hi Martin, On 10/09/2015 12:02, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Robert Wilton wrote: Hi Kent, I've a few comments on draft-kwatsen-netmod-opstate-00: 1) Having a related-state statement seems to be a good solution for binding oper nodes to config nodes that are not directly

Re: [netmod] posted: draft-kwatsen-netmod-opstate-00

Robert Wilton wrote: > Hi Kent, > > I've a few comments on draft-kwatsen-netmod-opstate-00: > > 1) Having a related-state statement seems to be a good solution for > binding oper nodes to config nodes that are not directly related in > the data tree. > > But I note that the

Re: [netmod] posted: draft-kwatsen-netmod-opstate-00

Hi Kent, I've a few comments on draft-kwatsen-netmod-opstate-00: 1) Having a related-state statement seems to be a good solution for binding oper nodes to config nodes that are not directly related in the data tree. But I note that the binding is attached to the config node. I had

[netmod] posted: draft-kwatsen-netmod-opstate-00

For next week's interim meeting, but feel free to post comments before then ;) Cheers, Kent On 9/2/15, 7:55 PM, "internet-dra...@ietf.org" wrote: > >A new version of I-D, draft-kwatsen-netmod-opstate-00.txt >has been successfully submitted by Kent Watsen and posted