Hi Kent,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Kent Watsen
Envoyé : jeudi 8 février 2024 16:55
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
Cc : netmod@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [netmod] rfc8407bis IANA guidance (enums vs identities)
Hi Mohamad,
Thanks for the response.
Some thoughts below.
K
On Feb 8
Hi Mohamad,
Thanks for the response.
Some thoughts below.
K
> On Feb 8, 2024, at 3:36 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Hi Kent, all,
>
> Let’s me also provide some background and explain why we are not using any
> normative language for enum vs identities. We used to have this te
Hi Mohamad,
Thanks for the response.
Some thoughts below.
K
> On Feb 8, 2024, at 3:36 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Hi Kent, all,
>
> Let’s me also provide some background and explain why we are not using any
> normative language for enum vs identities. We used to have this te
; ; netmod@ietf.org
Objet : RE: [netmod] rfc8407bis IANA guidance (enums vs identities)
Hi Kent, all,
Let's me also provide some background and explain why we are not using any
normative language for enum vs identities. We used to have this text in early
versions:
This recommendation ta
tf.org
Objet : [netmod] rfc8407bis IANA guidance (enums vs identities)
Authors, WG,
Following is a comment on Section 4.30.2.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-06#section-4.30.2
The text says:
START
An IANA-maintained module may use identities (e.g.
Authors, WG,
Following is a comment on Section 4.30.2.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-06#section-4.30.2
The text says:
START
An IANA-maintained module may use identities (e.g., [RFC8675]) or enumerations
(e.g., [RFC9108]). The decision about which typ
