> On 21 Oct 2015, at 15:26, Rob Shakir wrote:
>
> On 15 October 2015 at 15:13:38, Acee Lindem (acee) (a...@cisco.com) wrote:
>>
>> Do we really see associating the same interface with different
>> routing-instances for IPv4 and IPv6? I can seem to remember the use case
>> and it
> On 10/9/15, 9:00 AM, "netmod on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)"
>>> <netmod-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of a...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Lada,
>>>> I2RS is not chartered to do the base models. There are other routing
>>>> m
included by a single routing-instance.
>>
>>>
>>>I believe in all these cases the choice has to be limited to (1) L3
>>>interfaces, and (2) belonging to "own" routing instance. These
>>>constraints will have to be checked in server code somehow -
quot;
><netmod-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of lho...@nic.cz> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I am sorry for cross-posting but I think it is high time to decide the
>>relationship between the data models in i2rs-rib-data-model and
>>netmod-routing-cfg I-Ds because they clearl
dislav Lhotka"
>> <netmod-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of lho...@nic.cz> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am sorry for cross-posting but I think it is high time to decide the
>>> relationship between the data models in i2rs-rib-data-model and
>>
Hi,
I am sorry for cross-posting but I think it is high time to decide the
relationship between the data models in i2rs-rib-data-model and
netmod-routing-cfg I-Ds because they clearly target the same management data in
a router. I can see three possible scenarios:
1. The i2rs-rib module
t;Hi,
>
>I am sorry for cross-posting but I think it is high time to decide the
>relationship between the data models in i2rs-rib-data-model and
>netmod-routing-cfg I-Ds because they clearly target the same management
>data in a router. I can see three possible scenarios:
>
>1. The i2r
;>
>> I am sorry for cross-posting but I think it is high time to decide the
>> relationship between the data models in i2rs-rib-data-model and
>> netmod-routing-cfg I-Ds because they clearly target the same management
>> data in a router. I can see three possible scenario