> Cc: netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] status-description
>
> "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote:
> > What are your thoughts on having description statement under status in
> > yang-next?
>
> No problem! In fact, "description&quo
t; Date: Monday, May 4, 2020 at 1:32 PM
> To: Martin Björklund
> Cc: Balazs Lengyel , "Reshad Rahman
> (rrahman)" , NetMod WG
> Subject: Re: [netmod] status-description
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 9:38 AM Martin Björklund
> mailto:mbj%2bi...@4668.se>&
statement in
yang-next should not be an issue?
Regards,
Reshad.
From: 'Andy Bierman'
Date: Monday, May 4, 2020 at 1:32 PM
To: Martin Björklund
Cc: Balazs Lengyel , "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)"
, NetMod WG
Subject: Re: [netmod] status-description
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 9:38 AM Martin
t;
> > Regards Balazs
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: netmod On Behalf Of Sterne, Jason
> > (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
> > Sent: 2020. április 29., szerda 23:38
> > To: Reshad Rahman (rrahman) ;
> > Martin Björklund ; netmod@ietf.org
> >
mod On Behalf Of Sterne, Jason
> (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
> Sent: 2020. április 29., szerda 23:38
> To: Reshad Rahman (rrahman) ;
> Martin Björklund ; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] status-description (WAS Re: mbj review of
> draft-verdt-netmod-yang-module-versioning-01)
&g
Of Sterne, Jason (Nokia -
CA/Ottawa)
Sent: 2020. április 29., szerda 23:38
To: Reshad Rahman (rrahman) ; Martin
Björklund ; netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] status-description (WAS Re: mbj review of
draft-verdt-netmod-yang-module-versioning-01)
I think we could wait until YANG 2.0 to add
I think we could wait until YANG 2.0 to add a description to the status.
Without a status description, an intelligent "YANG diff" of the models would
produce this:
a) new status deprecated statement
b) change to a description
With a status description we'd identify this:
a) new status
