Re: [netmod] 答复: FW: a question about ietf-hardware yang module

2019-06-28 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:14:28AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 09:52:20AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:04:50PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > > Juergen

Re: [netmod] 答复: FW: a question about ietf-hardware yang module

2019-06-28 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 09:52:20AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:04:50PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:52:56PM +0200,

Re: [netmod] 答复: FW: a question about ietf-hardware yang module

2019-06-28 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 09:52:20AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:04:50PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:52:56PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > > > Yes,

Re: [netmod] 答复: FW: a question about ietf-hardware yang module

2019-06-28 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:04:50PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:52:56PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > > Yes, good point, I think the phrase "by a different hardware > > > > > component"

Re: [netmod] 答复: FW: a question about ietf-hardware yang module

2019-06-27 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:04:50PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:52:56PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > Yes, good point, I think the phrase "by a different hardware > > > > component" should be removed. It seems last-change

Re: [netmod] 答复: FW: a question about ietf-hardware yang module

2019-06-27 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:52:56PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > Yes, good point, I think the phrase "by a different hardware > > > component" should be removed. It seems last-change should change when > > > I unplug a component and I plug it back shortly

Re: [netmod] 答复: FW: a question about ietf-hardware yang module

2019-06-27 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:52:56PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Yes, good point, I think the phrase "by a different hardware > > component" should be removed. It seems last-change should change when > > I unplug a component and I plug it back shortly after, i.e., a > > component is replaced

Re: [netmod] 答复: FW: a question about ietf-hardware yang module

2019-06-27 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 04:59:08PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > > Sounds reasonable. But what exactly does "replaced by a different > > component" mean? Presumably it has the same name, but something else > > is different. > > > > Yes, good point, I

Re: [netmod] 答复: FW: a question about ietf-hardware yang module

2019-06-27 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 04:59:08PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Sounds reasonable. But what exactly does "replaced by a different > component" mean? Presumably it has the same name, but something else > is different. > Yes, good point, I think the phrase "by a different hardware

Re: [netmod] 答复: FW: a question about ietf-hardware yang module

2019-06-27 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 02:13:03AM +, Fengchong (frank) wrote: > > > > > > I think the ambiguity is 'list changed' - does this mean that list > > > entries are added/removed or does it include also the case where a > > > property of a list entry has changed.

Re: [netmod] 答复: FW: a question about ietf-hardware yang module

2019-06-26 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 02:13:03AM +, Fengchong (frank) wrote: > > > > I think the ambiguity is 'list changed' - does this mean that list > > entries are added/removed or does it include also the case where a > > property of a list entry has changed. > > Ok. Yes it is supposed to mean