Hi,
Not a full WGLC review, but one comment that I have on this draft (which partly
picks up a comment that Joe mentioned earlier regarding "yid-version").
I think that we should probably avoid using the term "yid-version" because
"yid" can be regarded as a racial slur, perhaps
Hello Jurgen,
See answers below as "BALAZS3". I am putting them into the -08 revision this
weekend.
One general comment:
As partial data sets are allowed, it is not always necessary to indicate if
a feature is not supported.
E.g. If you have an instance dataset for ietf-system, which does not
Hi, WG,
This is Ran. I have updated the draft draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-01
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-01). In this
document we define a method to tag data node associated with telemetry data in
YANG Modules. This YANG data node tagging method can be
-Original Message-
From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Sent: 2020. március 6., péntek 14:18
To: Balázs Lengyel
Subject: RE: URGENT kind of - RE: [netmod] WG Last Call:
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-06
Not a full WGLC review, but one comment that I have on this draft (which
partly
> -Original Message-
> From: Balázs Lengyel
> Sent: 06 March 2020 14:23
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; 'netmod@ietf.org'
>
> Subject: RE: URGENT kind of - RE: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-
> netmod-yang-instance-file-format-06
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Wilton
All,
This note is somewhat late, but we felt the need to get it out this week.
According to the IETF 107 meeting agenda [1], NETMOD is
scheduled to meet a total of 3 hours across 2 sessions, both on
Monday:
13:30-15:30 Monday Afternoon session I
18:10-19:10 Monday Afternoon session
