Lada,
Y34 is closed and I have not seen any new argument here that indicates
we made a major mistake with the resolution of Y34. As such, Y34
remains closed.
If you want to discuss new ideas to relocate or "symlink" data models,
please do so in a separate thread. (And no, we do not accept new
iss
Clyde,
Excellent, thanks!
> On Jul 20, 2015, at 7:57 PM, Clyde Wildes (cwildes) wrote:
>
> Carl,
>
> Thanks for your question in the Netmod meeting during the review of the
> ietf-syslog model.
>
> Regarding the model implementation: the model has been implemented in ODL and
> internally
Carl,
Thanks for your question in the Netmod meeting during the review of the
ietf-syslog model.
Regarding the model implementation: the model has been implemented in ODL and
internally in Cisco's NXOS.
Thanks,
Clyde
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@
> On 20 Jul 2015, at 19:29, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > On 20 Jul 2015, at 17:00, Andy Bierman wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >
> > > On 20 Jul 2015, at 14:55, Andy Bierman wro
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > On 20 Jul 2015, at 17:00, Andy Bierman wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >
> > > On 20 Jul 2015, at 14:55, Andy Bierman wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Can you explain why we need 2
> On 20 Jul 2015, at 17:00, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > On 20 Jul 2015, at 14:55, Andy Bierman wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can you explain why we need 2 broken anyxmls?
> > (The original and a synonym?) The whole point of
> > any
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > On 20 Jul 2015, at 14:55, Andy Bierman wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can you explain why we need 2 broken anyxmls?
> > (The original and a synonym?) The whole point of
> > anydata is that it does not have XML cruft in it.
>
> Yes, I und
> On 20 Jul 2015, at 14:55, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can you explain why we need 2 broken anyxmls?
> (The original and a synonym?) The whole point of
> anydata is that it does not have XML cruft in it.
Yes, I understand this was your main priority. For implementors using
off-the-shelf
Hi,
Can you explain why we need 2 broken anyxmls?
(The original and a synonym?) The whole point of
anydata is that it does not have XML cruft in it.
I also don't get the value of a single top-level node called 'device'
that every YANG model on the planet is supposed to augment.
Can you explain w
> On 20 Jul 2015, at 14:45, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> after listening to the presentation of
> draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-00 at RTGWG session, I am wondering
> whether the solution chosen for Y34 is really useful.
>
> The draft states they want to reuse ietf-interfaces but the
Hi,
after listening to the presentation of
draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-00 at RTGWG session, I am wondering
whether the solution chosen for Y34 is really useful.
The draft states they want to reuse ietf-interfaces but their tree in
fact is
+--rw device
+--rw info
|
11 matches
Mail list logo