Randy Presuhn writes:
> Hi -
>
>> From: Andy Bierman
>> Sent: Aug 18, 2015 10:22 AM
>> To: Robert Wilton
>> Cc: NETMOD Working Group
>> Subject: Re: [netmod] Y34 - root node
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Robert Wilton wrote:
> ...
>> > I think that having fixed paths may end up being to
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
> [Adding authors and RTG WG.]
>
> Hi Andy,
> I'm not sure who you are looking to hear from as you addressed this
> mail to the netmod list. I'm happy to give my opinion as it seems you
> might have been aiming this at the draft authors. (bu
[Adding authors and RTG WG.]
Hi Andy,
I'm not sure who you are looking to hear from as you addressed this
mail to the netmod list. I'm happy to give my opinion as it seems you
might have been aiming this at the draft authors. (but then again
perhaps not.)
On 8/18/2015 8:01 PM, Andy Bierman
Hi,
I assume this draft is what we should be reviewing and not
the obsolete openconfig draft?
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-00
Q1) scope
sec 2:
The model organization can itself be thought of as a "meta-model",
in that it describes the relationships be
Hi -
> From: Andy Bierman
> Sent: Aug 18, 2015 10:22 AM
> To: Robert Wilton
> Cc: NETMOD Working Group
> Subject: Re: [netmod] Y34 - root node
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Robert Wilton wrote:
...
> > I think that having fixed paths may end up being too restrictive.
>
> This is how langua
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Robert Wilton wrote:
>
>
> On 11/08/2015 08:38, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
>> On 10 Aug 2015, at 22:15, Andy Bierman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Acee Lindem (acee)
>>> wrote:
>>> I think there is agreement that there is a problem. The
On 11/08/2015 08:38, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
On 10 Aug 2015, at 22:15, Andy Bierman wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
I think there is agreement that there is a problem. The YANG Routing Design
Team is addressing this with
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-rt
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > On 18 Aug 2015, at 15:42, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >
> > Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 18 Aug 2015, at 13:09, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> although YANG 1.1 issue Y26 [1] is marked
> On 18 Aug 2015, at 15:42, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>>
>>> On 18 Aug 2015, at 13:09, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
Hi,
although YANG 1.1 issue Y26 [1] is marked as DONE, I think the adopted
solution Y26-02
Tom,
this may be a useful read...
https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/interim-meetings-2000-08-29.html
/js
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 08:51:07AM -0400, Nadeau Thomas wrote:
>
> BTW Benoit’s note below and the WebEx should serve as the official
> notification to the WG that we will be havin
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > On 18 Aug 2015, at 13:09, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> although YANG 1.1 issue Y26 [1] is marked as DONE, I think the adopted
> >> solution Y26-02 is really horrible, so at least I want to make sure
> >> th
BTW Benoit’s note below and the WebEx should serve as the official
notification to the WG that we will be having this interim meeting. It was
officially registered with the WG meeting tracker too. Despite this, someone
pointed out the other day that I’d not officially announced it. C
> On 18 Aug 2015, at 13:09, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> although YANG 1.1 issue Y26 [1] is marked as DONE, I think the adopted
>> solution Y26-02 is really horrible, so at least I want to make sure the
>> WG is aware of the consequences.
>>
>> I am
Hi,
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> although YANG 1.1 issue Y26 [1] is marked as DONE, I think the adopted
> solution Y26-02 is really horrible, so at least I want to make sure the
> WG is aware of the consequences.
>
> I am currently working on a data model for DNS zone data and the schema
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
