[netmod] anydata interaction with yang-patch and edit config (RE: 6020bis - anydata)

Hi, I have two quick questions with regards to anydata - related to the topic of the thread, but concerning a separate topic. (1) How does yang-patch interact with anydata? In particular, could you apply a yang-patch edit to a data node within the anydata? (While the module may not have

Re: [netmod] 6020bis - anydata

Randy Presuhn writes: > Hi - > >>From: Ladislav Lhotka >>Sent: Oct 1, 2015 12:24 AM >>To: Juergen Schoenwaelder >>Cc: Randy Presuhn , netmod@ietf.org >>Subject: Re: [netmod] 6020bis

Re: [netmod] anydata interaction with yang-patch and edit config

Thanks, Martin, this is very clear. (Too bad actually - I could see applications for this.) --- Alex -Original Message- From: Martin Bjorklund [mailto:m...@tail-f.com] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 2:21 PM To: Alexander Clemm (alex) Cc:

Re: [netmod] opstate-reqs issue #1 - Define/Clarify "fully synchronized" in "Requirement 1.D"

This issue appears to have become more like issue #5 – should we mark this one a duplicate of the other? As for this, what does it mean? > > - templates: the intended data model and applied data model are disjoint > > This came up towards the end of the interim, and my understanding is that

Re: [netmod] 6020bis - anydata

> On 05 Oct 2015, at 11:57, Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 11:48:10AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > >> I am certainly concerned. The current definition of "anydata" ("an >> unknown set of nodes that can be modelled with

Re: [netmod] 6020bis - anydata

> On 05 Oct 2015, at 13:44, Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:32:46PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> >>> On 05 Oct 2015, at 11:57, Juergen Schoenwaelder >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Oct

[netmod] Choice corner Cases -1

Hello, What do the mandatory statements mean in the following model ? choice scen8 { // Embedded choices with multiple mandatory cases; invalid scenario case A { choice subChoiceA { mandatory true; case