Tim Bray wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 10:21 AM Martin Björklund wrote:
>
> >
> > If an XML document has , won't the XML processor
> > pass the attribute "xmlns:bar" and its value to the application? This
> > should be enough even if the XML processor doesn't provide a mapping
> > table
Dear NETMOD WG,
This message begins a two-week WGLC for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11 ending
on Friday, February 18th. Here is a direct link to the HTML version of the
draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11.html
Positive comments, e.g.,
On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 01:53:29PM -0800, Tim Bray wrote:
>
> Then if you look at 9.10.5 "Usage Examples", the examples make it pretty
> clear what's happening, and that the namespace prefix has to be used in the
> element.
>
> But, I think that since this is not an XML best practice,
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 10:04 AM Andy Bierman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the text in 7950 is clear enough.
> The examples for identityref use prefix strings that are not the YANG
> prefix.
> The prefix value is arbitrary and it just needs to match an xmlns
> attribute.
> Are you saying sections
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 10:21 AM Martin Björklund wrote:
>
> If an XML document has , won't the XML processor
> pass the attribute "xmlns:bar" and its value to the application? This
> should be enough even if the XML processor doesn't provide a mapping
> table between prefix and namespace (it
The quoted text applies to the resolutione of foo:bar within YANG,
which is different from resolving foo:bar within an XML serialized
data tree.
> Is there a reason to violate the SHOULD?
There is no global registry of prefixes, hence collisions in the
prefix namespace can occur.
/js
On Thu,
Hi,
Tim Bray wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 9:46 AM Andy Bierman wrote:
>
> >
> > libxml2 has an API to get the namespace for a string node.
> >
>
> Just to get the terms correct, it's not the "namespace" you need to get,
> you need to get the XML prefix mapped to that namespace, and the
Hi,
I think the text in 7950 is clear enough.
The examples for identityref use prefix strings that are not the YANG
prefix.
The prefix value is arbitrary and it just needs to match an xmlns attribute.
Are you saying sections 9.10.3 and 9.10.5 are wrong and need to be changed?
Andy
On Thu,
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 9:46 AM Andy Bierman wrote:
>
> libxml2 has an API to get the namespace for a string node.
>
Just to get the terms correct, it's not the "namespace" you need to get,
you need to get the XML prefix mapped to that namespace, and the prefix has
to be the same inside the
>> [mj] That is correct. We have been beaten up enough number of times for
not using the prefix defined by the YANG module. Is the suggestion to state
that in the draft?
Yes, or more simply, the suggestion is to just say what's going on: That
the prefix you use inside the element has to be the
On 3. Feb 2022, at 18:43, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
>
>> [mj] That is correct. We have been beaten up enough number of times for not
>> using the prefix defined by the YANG module. Is the suggestion to state that
>> in the draft?
RFC 7950, Section 7.1.4:
When used inside the "import"
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 9:07 AM Tim Bray wrote:
> Hi everyone, I'm the person on the XML directorate who raised this issue
> in conversation with Ian Farrer in a review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang.
> After a lot of back and forth, I think we came to agreement on the
> necessary language
Hi Tim,
See inline with [mj] as I cannot seem to insert my comments between the text
without distinguishing it from the rest of the thread.
> On Feb 3, 2022, at 9:07 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
>
> Hi everyone, I'm the person on the XML directorate who raised this issue in
> conversation with Ian
Hi everyone, I'm the person on the XML directorate who raised this issue in
conversation with Ian Farrer in a review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang.
After a lot of back and forth, I think we came to agreement on the
necessary language to address this issue. I believe that language has.
been
Hi,
I think the text from sec 4 refers to the usage within an application.
The XML instance document is the on-the-wire representation and
the I-D example looks correct.
https://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names/#ns-qualnames
Andy
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 3:53 AM tom petch wrote:
> From: netmod on
From: netmod on behalf of ianfar...@gmx.com
Sent: 03 February 2022 09:37
Hi,
A draft I have been working on
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang/) contains a
number of XML configuration examples. During the XML expert review, a question
has been raised about the use
Hi,
A draft I have been working on
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang/) contains a
number of XML configuration examples. During the XML expert review, a question
has been raised about the use of XML namespaces in these examples. I’m raising
it here as I don’t have
17 matches
Mail list logo
