On 2023-06-19 16:21:50, tom petch wrote:
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>
>
> Given
>leaf percentage {
> type decimal64 {
> fraction-digits 1;
> range "0..99";
> is 99.5 a valid value? It is greater than 99 which is the maximum value
>
On Nov 12 17:33 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Robert Wilton wrote:
> > In the Thursday Netmod meeting, it was interesting to hear Rob Shakir
> > describe how deviations and augmentations are used in OpenConfig to
> > add functionality into an older YANG model where the semver rules
> > prevent
On Nov 09 14:42 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > The
> > point of requirement 1.4 was to say that the DT felt previous versions
> > of modules needed to support fixes without bringing in elements from head.
>
> I think this means that you require branching.
>
> But is this still the point of the
On Nov 06 04:41 AM, Carey, Timothy (Nokia - US) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the IETF 103 meeting a comment was made that using the reset-datastore RPC
> doesn't actually reset the device to factory settings.
>
> I would like to suggest that this RPC when applied to the start-up store have
> the
On 01/21/2016 12:45 AM, Qin Wu wrote:
> 1. This draft defines two module, one is IETF-PACKET-FIELDS, the other is
> ietf-access-control-list module,
> I am wondering whether ietf-packet-fields module can be defined in more
> generic way that can be applied to other modules defined somewhere
On 01/19/2016 08:11 AM, Dean Bogdanovic wrote:
>>> >> Authors are Cisco/Juniper people, so were using that terminology and I
>>> >> believe that CSCO and JNPR are more used in networking then Linux :)
>>> >>
>> >
>> > If I were to have the time, I would even challenge you on
>> > that.
On 01/11/2016 11:30 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> In the XML shown, can you not
> > >>> leave out all the fields that are not set? This would remove a lot
> > >>> of noise. I do not understand what having both actions deny and
> > >>> permit at the same time means. Did you
