On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 3:32 AM Rob Wilton (rwilton)
wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: netmod On Behalf Of Martin Bjorklund
> > Sent: 26 September 2019 08:45
> > To: lho...@nic.cz
> > Cc: yang...@huawei.com; netmod@ietf.org
> > Su
Martin Bjorklund writes:
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 11:04 +, Schönwälder, Jürgen wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:27:17PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> > > > Sure, one can discuss whether this feature is useful or harmful
>> > > > but the only way to
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 11:04 +, Schönwälder, Jürgen wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:27:17PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > > Sure, one can discuss whether this feature is useful or harmful
> > > > but the only way to officially remove this is to create a new
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 11:04 +, Schönwälder, Jürgen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:27:17PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > Sure, one can discuss whether this feature is useful or harmful
> > > but the only way to officially remove this is to create a new
> > > specification and to run
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:27:17PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >
> > Sure, one can discuss whether this feature is useful or harmful
> > but the only way to officially remove this is to create a new
> > specification and to run it through the IETF process.
>
> I do insist that the wording in
> -Original Message-
> From: netmod On Behalf Of Martin Bjorklund
> Sent: 26 September 2019 08:45
> To: lho...@nic.cz
> Cc: yang...@huawei.com; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netmod] 答复: 答复: Please clarify implementation about
> ‘when’
>
> &g
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 09:39 +, Schönwälder, Jürgen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 09:45:26AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > > > >o There MUST be no nodes tagged with "when" present if the "when"
> > > > > condition evaluates to "false" in the data tree.
> > > >
> > > > It
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 09:45:26AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > >
> > > >o There MUST be no nodes tagged with "when" present if the "when"
> > >
> > > > condition evaluates to "false" in the data tree.
> > >
> > >
> > > It also says in 8.2:
> > >
> > >o If a request
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 08:56 +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > Andy Bierman writes:
> >
> > >
> >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 8:44 AM Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) <
> >
> > > > jason.ste...@nokia.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
>
e data
> tree with the "when" expression is deleted by the server.
Right. But the request won't modify a configuration data node because it is
rejected. So the premise of the above implication doesn't hold, and the
conclusion doesn't apply.
Lada
>
&g
ed by the server.
/martin
>
> This can also be prevented if the server rejects an edit operation
> that would create such a situation.
>
> Lada
>
>
> >
> >
> >> Jason
> >>
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> >>
> >&
nt if the "when"
condition evaluates to "false" in the data tree.
This can also be prevented if the server rejects an edit operation that would
create such a situation.
Lada
>
>
>> Jason
>>
>
> Andy
>
>
>>
>>
>> *From:* net
statement in
> the below example model?
>
> I thought validation error will still be received when the config change
> is reject in “scene 2”.
>
sorry for the confusion. it was right the first time.
when-stmt has auto-delete.
must-stmt has error instead of auto-delete.
Andy
Jason
t; and "when" with different behavior.
> A server that does not implement the auto-delete aspects of when-stmt is
> not compliant to the RFC.
>
>
oops -- s/must-stmt/when-stmt/
> Jason
>>
>
> Andy
>
>
>>
>>
>> *From:* netmod
*Qin Wu
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 10, 2019 10:33 PM
> *To:* Fengchong (frank) ; Andy Bierman <
> a...@yumaworks.com>
> *Cc:* netmod@ietf.org; Yangang
> *Subject:* [netmod] 答复: 答复: Please clarify implementation about ‘when’
>
>
>
> Why processing order matter? My
Why processing order matter? My interpretation is both leaf node values
(i.e.,leaf a, leaf b) should be validated together and commit as a whole,
RFC6241 said:
“
If the device is unable to commit all of the changes in the
candidate configuration datastore, then the running
16 matches
Mail list logo
