Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-dbb-netmod-acl in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

2022-12-08 Thread tom petch
From: netmod  on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee) 

Sent: 07 December 2022 11:56

NETMOD WG,

From: netmod  on behalf of Mahesh Jethanandani 

Date: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 6:58 PM

Is this in-lieu of a call for adoption, or did I somehow miss the call for 
adoption? I do see a separate IPR call.

Either ways, I do support the work, whether as a separate draft or as a bis of 
the original work. Would have preferred the latter, if not for anything else 
but to see how a YANG model can be updated in IETF.

This is a separate draft. I would be opposed to a BIS of RFC 8519. While the 
new capabilities are useful, I doubt anyone is going to implement them any time 
soon so let’s not complicate RFC 8519.



Me too - separate draft.

Tom Petch

Thanks,
Acee

Cheers.


On Dec 5, 2022, at 2:41 PM, IETF Secretariat 
mailto:ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org>> wrote:


The NETMOD WG has placed draft-dbb-netmod-acl in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Lou Berger)

The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dbb-netmod-acl/


___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-dbb-netmod-acl in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

2022-12-07 Thread Lou Berger
No, a formal adoption call is forthcoming. We just started the process with the 
ior call, updated the data tracker and it sent the mail.  Stay tuned...

Lou



On December 6, 2022 6:57:53 PM Mahesh Jethanandani  
wrote:

Is this in-lieu of a call for adoption, or did I somehow miss the call for 
adoption? I do see a separate IPR call.

Either ways, I do support the work, whether as a separate draft or as a bis of 
the original work. Would have preferred the latter, if not for anything else 
but to see how a YANG model can be updated in IETF.

Cheers.

On Dec 5, 2022, at 2:41 PM, IETF Secretariat 
mailto:ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org>> wrote:


The NETMOD WG has placed draft-dbb-netmod-acl in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Lou Berger)

The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dbb-netmod-acl/


___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanand...@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanand...@gmail.com>






___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-dbb-netmod-acl in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

2022-12-07 Thread Acee Lindem (acee)
NETMOD WG,

From: netmod  on behalf of Mahesh Jethanandani 

Date: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 at 6:58 PM
To: "netmod-cha...@ietf.org" 
Cc: netmod 
Subject: Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-dbb-netmod-acl in state 
"Candidate for WG Adoption"

Is this in-lieu of a call for adoption, or did I somehow miss the call for 
adoption? I do see a separate IPR call.

Either ways, I do support the work, whether as a separate draft or as a bis of 
the original work. Would have preferred the latter, if not for anything else 
but to see how a YANG model can be updated in IETF.

This is a separate draft. I would be opposed to a BIS of RFC 8519. While the 
new capabilities are useful, I doubt anyone is going to implement them any time 
soon so let’s not complicate RFC 8519.

Thanks,
Acee

Cheers.


On Dec 5, 2022, at 2:41 PM, IETF Secretariat 
mailto:ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org>> wrote:


The NETMOD WG has placed draft-dbb-netmod-acl in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Lou Berger)

The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dbb-netmod-acl/


___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanand...@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanand...@gmail.com>





___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


Re: [netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-dbb-netmod-acl in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

2022-12-06 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani
Is this in-lieu of a call for adoption, or did I somehow miss the call for 
adoption? I do see a separate IPR call.

Either ways, I do support the work, whether as a separate draft or as a bis of 
the original work. Would have preferred the latter, if not for anything else 
but to see how a YANG model can be updated in IETF. 

Cheers.

> On Dec 5, 2022, at 2:41 PM, IETF Secretariat 
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> The NETMOD WG has placed draft-dbb-netmod-acl in state
> Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Lou Berger)
> 
> The document is available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dbb-netmod-acl/
> 
> 
> ___
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanand...@gmail.com






___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


[netmod] The NETMOD WG has placed draft-dbb-netmod-acl in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

2022-12-05 Thread IETF Secretariat


The NETMOD WG has placed draft-dbb-netmod-acl in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Lou Berger)

The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dbb-netmod-acl/


___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod