Re: [netmod] deviation-stmt (7.20.3)

2016-10-05 Thread Andy Bierman
ailto:a...@yumaworks.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, 04 October, 2016 18:56 > *To:* Balázs Lengyel <balazs.leng...@ericsson.com> > *Cc:* netmod@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [netmod] deviation-stmt (7.20.3) > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Balazs Lengyel <

Re: [netmod] deviation-stmt (7.20.3)

2016-10-05 Thread Balázs Lengyel
tf.org Subject: Re: [netmod] deviation-stmt (7.20.3) On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Balazs Lengyel <balazs.leng...@ericsson.com<mailto:balazs.leng...@ericsson.com>> wrote: My biggest problem with deviations is that a number of things can not be deviated: * description * ref

Re: [netmod] deviation-stmt (7.20.3)

2016-10-04 Thread Andy Bierman
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Balazs Lengyel wrote: > My biggest problem with deviations is that a number of things can not be > deviated: > >- description >- reference > > This does seem quite useful. I wonder why it got left out. The way deviations

Re: [netmod] deviation-stmt (7.20.3)

2016-09-30 Thread Balazs Lengyel
My biggest problem with deviations is that a number of things can not be deviated: description reference Regards Balazs On 2016-09-30 00:22, Andy Bierman wrote: Hi, The deviation section

Re: [netmod] deviation-stmt (7.20.3)

2016-09-30 Thread Andy Bierman
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Andy Bierman wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Martin Bjorklund > wrote: > > > > > Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > The deviation

Re: [netmod] deviation-stmt (7.20.3)

2016-09-30 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Andy Bierman wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > Andy Bierman wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > The deviation section has a lot of fluff text about how bad deviations > > are, > > > but very little text on

Re: [netmod] deviation-stmt (7.20.3)

2016-09-30 Thread Andy Bierman
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Andy Bierman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The deviation section has a lot of fluff text about how bad deviations > are, > > but very little text on how to process the "deviate" statement correctly. > > >

Re: [netmod] deviation-stmt (7.20.3)

2016-09-29 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Andy Bierman wrote: > Hi, > > The deviation section has a lot of fluff text about how bad deviations are, > but very little text on how to process the "deviate" statement correctly. > > The text is not clear if the statements altered in the target module > are semantic

[netmod] deviation-stmt (7.20.3)

2016-09-29 Thread Andy Bierman
Hi, The deviation section has a lot of fluff text about how bad deviations are, but very little text on how to process the "deviate" statement correctly. The text is not clear if the statements altered in the target module are semantic patches or syntactic patches. Are the sub-statements of the