Bob,
I will add your wording in the next revision.
Thanks,
Clyde
From: Bob Harold <rharo...@umich.edu>
Date: Monday, March 5, 2018 at 11:06 AM
To: Clyde Wildes <cwil...@cisco.com>
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-sys
default compare rule (all messages of the
>
> specified severity and greater match) or if the
>
> select-adv-compare feature is present, use the advance-compare
>
> rule.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Clyde
>
>
>
> *From: *netmo
<rharo...@umich.edu>
Date: Friday, March 2, 2018 at 12:33 PM
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23
Sorry for being late to the discussion - just joined this group.
Can we have "higher severity" match "higher
Sorry for being late to the discussion - just joined this group.
Can we have "higher severity" match "higher number" in the enumerated
values, to avoid confusion?
In section 4.1. The ietf-syslog Module
on Page 11
typedef syslog-severity {
-- should be in the order:
debug=0
emergency=7
