On 06/12/2017 08:31 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 10:55:20AM +, Bogaert, Bart (Nokia -
BE/Antwerp) wrote:
>
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language of the IETF.
Title : YANG Tree Diagrams
Authors : Martin Bjorklund
Lou Berger
Hi,
the typical -state tree consists of config false nodes and hence it
represents operational state. This is not a transitioning period
question, this is how -state trees were designed. Note also that the
applied configuration is part of the operational state in NMDA - for
config true objects,
Hi Lada,
We have got two questions on how to specify the module entries in a schema:
1. Are augmentations of parent modules inherited when augmented module
is listed in schema-mounts schema?
For example, ietf-ospf module augments ietf-routing. When we include
ietf-routing to the
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Andy Bierman writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
> > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 10:55:20AM +, Bogaert, Bart
During discussing the adoption of this guidelines, a question came up w.r.t.
the semantics of the non-NMDA "-state" module during the transitioning period:
What kind of state do the leaves in the "-state" module represent? The applied
configuration or the actually used operational data?
Since
Presumably a device is free to not implement an optional config=false node if
that node would never be returned in a response anyway - as this will make no
externally visible difference.
However, if the model states or implies that the node is present under certain
conditions (for example,
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language of the IETF.
Title : YANG Module Classification
Authors : Dean Bogdanovic
Benoit Claise
Andy Bierman writes:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
> j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 10:55:20AM +, Bogaert, Bart (Nokia -
>> BE/Antwerp) wrote:
>> >
>> > We have a question regarding the statistics
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'YANG Module Classification'
(draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-08.txt) as Informational RFC
This document is the product of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Warren Kumari and Benoit Claise.
10 matches
Mail list logo