Hi,
We were wondering if it would make sense to introduce features in the IANA if
types YANG model to enable grouping of related interface types. This would
allow implementations to include only the types it really requires (by
supporting the related features but not the others) and (in case o
Hi,
Thank you for this review! Comments inline.
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> Here is my review of draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-09.
>
> * Abstract
>
>This document defines a mechanism to combine YANG modules into the
>schema defined in other YANG modules.
>
> I do not know what
Hi,
Rohit Ranade wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your responses.
>
> I have gone through the LNE draft and YANG 1.1 and found some more
> suggestions.
>
>
>
> 1. Section 5
>
>"If a mounted YANG module defines an RPC operation, clients can invoke
>
>this operation as i
This working group last call completed Wednesday April 4th.
It looks like there are no outstanding discussion threads going on now,
and the recent discussion has mostly been clarificatory.
Editorial changes proposed as a result of WGLC review look largely
superficial to schema mount itself.
http
I haven't seen any previous discussions on the topic, but we have a similar
problem.
Note this is not really to do with YANG itself, so much as the practical
limitations of the software package that provides our CLI interface.
In NETCONF, the existence of extra unused identities doesn't pose an