Re: [netmod] example in draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-04

Lada, Thanks for your review. All was not added to the syslogtypes:severity because that would alter the definition of severity as specified by RFC 5424 in Table 2 on page 10. I agree that it will simplify the model to do so. Please advise. Thanks, Clyde On 7/14/15, 6:57 AM, netmod on

Re: [netmod] example in draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-04

Wildes (cwildes) cwil...@cisco.com wrote: Lada, Thanks for your review. All was not added to the syslogtypes:severity because that would alter the definition of severity as specified by RFC 5424 in Table 2 on page 10. I agree that it will simplify the model to do so. The description

[netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-04.txt Implementations

Carl, Thanks for your question in the Netmod meeting during the review of the ietf-syslog model. Regarding the model implementation: the model has been implemented in ODL and internally in Cisco's NXOS. Thanks, Clyde ___ netmod mailing list

[netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-05 Draft Status

Hi, This e-mail summarizes the changes that have been made to the proposed ietf-syslog.yang model since the July meeting when the previous 04 draft was published. The changes are based on feedback received after the last meeting from Martin Bjorklund, Lada Lhotka, Jason Sterne, and Mahesh

Re: [netmod] syslog-model-05: terminal logging vs session logging

Jason, We are about to publish draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-06 which separates terminal logging from session logging. We appreciate your feedback. Thanks, Clyde From: netmod > on behalf of "Sterne, Jason (Jason)"

Re: [netmod] syslog-model-05: minor editorial comments

Jason, We are about to publish draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-06 which incorporates your feedback below. Thanks, Clyde From: netmod > on behalf of "Sterne, Jason (Jason)"

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-08.txt

;course). The use case for multiple log buffers is that you might sort/filter >different types of log events into different circular buffers (i.e. have one >for really critical log events, etc) for viewing on the node. > >Regards, >Jason > >-Original Message- >Fro

Re: [netmod] NETMOD SYSLOG YANG Model / additional attributes

Dmytro, RFC 5424 The Syslog Protocol, defines the message format for syslog messages and the proposed ietf-syslog.yang model supports both free form and structured data format Syslog messages as specified by RFC 5424. TIMESTAMP is described in section 6.2.3 of the RFC. Sequence number could be

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-06

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft Clyde On 2/22/16, 5:22 PM, "Lou Berger" wrote: >Authors, Contributors, WG, > >As part of the preparation for WG Last Call > >Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? > >Please state either: >

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-06

Lou, We are working on a revision to the document to address the concerns that Martin and Tom raised. There is one issue that I need to raise to the Netmod chairs for advice: all our drafts since the original draft have "Intended status: Informational" at the top of the draft. Martin

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-07.txt

<ie...@btconnect.com> wrote: > >- Original Message ----- >From: "Clyde Wildes (cwildes)" <cwil...@cisco.com> >To: <netmod@ietf.org> >Cc: "Martin Bjorklund" <m...@tail-f.com>; "t.petch" ><ie...@btconnect.com>; "Ki

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model

Patrick, Thanks for your review. Regarding the severity leaf: multiple severities are already covered when severity is specified because the default severity comparison is all messages of the specified severity and greater. You can use of the optional pattern-match string to select a message

Re: [netmod] partial review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-08.txt

Juergen, Thanks for your detailed review! I addressed all of your comments in the latest draft. Regards, Clyde On 6/15/16, 8:29 AM, "netmod on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder" wrote: >Hi, > >Dan Romascanu

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-08.txt

pes of log events into >different circular buffers (i.e. have one for really critical log >events, etc) for viewing on the node. >> >> Regards, >> Jason >> >> -Original Message- >> From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of EXT Clyde >

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-11

-12=--hwdiff Please review and comment. Thanks, Clyde From: "Clyde Wildes (cwildes)" <cwil...@cisco.com> Date: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 at 2:54 PM To: Andy Bierman <a...@yumaworks.com> Cc: Alex Campbell <alex.campb...@aviatnet.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <

Re: [netmod] syslog-model-11 single buffer vs list

I think it was accidently dropped due to some confusion over some "if-feature" comments from Tom P at one point. (note - also add (s) to buffer to make it buffer(s) in a couple of places in section 3). Regards, Jason -Original Message- From: netmod [m

Re: [netmod] syslog-model-11 single buffer vs list

- CA)" <jason.ste...@nokia.com> Date: Monday, November 14, 2016 at 7:58 PM To: "Clyde Wildes (cwildes)" <cwil...@cisco.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org> Subject: RE: syslog-model-11 single buffer vs list Hi Clyde, Most implementations probably have lim

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-11.txt

Hi, This draft addresses Phil Shafer’s comments and also removes references to TLS for now. Thanks, Clyde On 11/13/16, 3:47 PM, "netmod on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org" wrote: A New Internet-Draft is available

Re: [netmod] partial review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-08.txt

10:37:06PM +0000, Clyde Wildes (cwildes) wrote: > Juergen, > > Thanks for your detailed review! > > I addressed all of your comments in the latest draft. Thanks for the update. As my role as a YANG doctoc and someone generally interested, I took anoth

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-10.txt

Hi Phil, Thanks for your review. My comments inline as [clyde]. On 10/31/16, 5:45 PM, "netmod on behalf of Phil Shafer" wrote: >Title : A YANG Data Model for Syslog Configuration I've a few questions:

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-11

Kent, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft Thanks, Clyde On 12/13/16, 4:15 PM, "Kent Watsen" wrote: Authors, Contributors, WG, This IPR disclosure requests is being made as part of the preparation for WG Last Call of

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-11

Hi Alex, Thanks for your review. My comments are inline as [clyde]… On 12/13/16, 8:16 PM, "netmod on behalf of Alex Campbell" wrote: I am considering to implement the data model in this draft. I have reviewed this

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-11

Kent, I will respond to Andy’s comments this morning and publish a new draft ASAP. It would be very helpful if Andy and Alex could work with me on the new draft. Thanks, Clyde On 1/10/17, 11:34 AM, "Kent Watsen" wrote: Hi Clyde, The LC period has ended.

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-11

Any My comments inline as [clyde2]… From: Andy Bierman <a...@yumaworks.com> Date: Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 8:24 AM To: "Clyde Wildes (cwildes)" <cwil...@cisco.com> Cc: Alex Campbell <alex.campb...@aviatnet.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@iet

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-11

Hi Andy, Thanks for taking the time to review the model. My comments are inline as [clyde]… From: netmod on behalf of Andy Bierman Date: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 at 3:04 PM To: Alex Campbell Cc: "netmod@ietf.org"

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-12

Tom, Inline… On 3/16/17, 10:04 AM, "t.petch" <ie...@btconnect.com> wrote: - Original Message - From: "Clyde Wildes (cwildes)" <cwil...@cisco.com> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 6:11 PM > Tom, > > The next revision of th

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-12

Tom, The next revision of the draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model includes a change to the Yang tree diagram explanation to include the text from RFC6087bis. RFC5426 is referenced in the model where "Transmission of Syslog Messages over UDP” occurs: case udp {

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-11

Dale, Thanks for the simplification. I have incorporated this in the next draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model revision. Regards, Clyde On 3/6/17, 12:53 PM, "Dale R. Worley" wrote: (We seem to be well beyond the original LC date, but this is only an editorial

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

Kent, Thanks for your exhaustive review. I will be publishing the revised model momentarily. Comments inline as [clyde]. On 7/12/17, 2:55 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" wrote: As shepherd, yang doctor, and individual

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

Kent, Comments inline as [clyde]… On 8/14/17, 6:53 AM, "Kent Watsen" wrote: >5. S1 as a whole. I'm a bit unclear what this section is doing. It >seems to be a general summary of Syslog (RFC5424). Do we need this here? > > [clyde]

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

Juergen and Alex, The choice of Posix 1003.2 regular expressions was because of multiple vendors who supported same and asked for model support: http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos12.3/topics/reference/configuration-statement/syslog-edit-system.html

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

Hi Alex, Answers inline as [clyde]… On 7/17/17, 4:20 PM, "netmod on behalf of Alex Campbell" wrote: I am considering to implement the data model in this draft. (dependent on business priorities of course) I have

Re: [netmod] Some questions about "draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-13"

to an IP address? If so, the answer is yes. TLS was added as a destination transport choice in revision 14 of the draft. Regards, Clyde From: "Zhengguangying (Walker)" <zhengguangy...@huawei.com> Date: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 11:25 PM To: "Clyde Wildes (cwildes

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15

. This might be a challenge for the RFC Editor. Tom Petch - Original Message ----- From: "Clyde Wildes (cwildes)" <cwil...@cisco.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 6:48 PM > Hi Alex, > > Answers inline as [cl

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-16.txt

Tom, I am working with Mahesh to fix the Normative References. Regarding line length: I am using pyang 1.7.3 which is not complaining about line length in the model. But when I look at the draft I see that both the tree and the model exceed 80 characters. I will make a pass to shorten lines.

[netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-14 Signing Options

Hi, As part of the last few steps before again calling for last call for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-14, we are adding certificate support to the signing-options container. RFC 5848: Signed Syslog Messages is the RFC that governs this section. The signing-options container resides within

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-14 Signing Options

Kent, Yes! Sorry for the delay. Clyde On 6/7/17, 11:13 AM, "Kent Watsen" wrote: Hi Clyde, Since no concerns have been raised, should we be expecting an updated syslog draft shortly? Kent // as shepherd -- Hi, As part of

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15.txt

Hi, The latest draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15 contains updates to the signing-options container as a result of a review by Kent Watsen and Alex Clemm. Diffs can be seen at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-14=draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-15 Thanks, Clyde

Re: [netmod] syslog-model-17 shepherd writeup issues -references

Benoit, There were approximately 24 changes requested from you, Kent, Robert Wilton, and Tom Petch. I have made approximately half of them and will try to finish another revision of the draft by Friday. Thanks, Clyde On 9/27/17, 3:24 AM, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" wrote:

Re: [netmod] syslog-model-17 shepherd writeup issues -references

@btconnect.com> wrote: Clyde A quick glance at -18 shows that there is now a Normative Reference for Posix - good- but I do not see it referenced - not so good:-( I think that there needs to be a reference in 4.1 Tom Petch - Original Message -----

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-19.txt

Kent, I will remove TLS if that is the preference of the chair and the working group. RFC 6587 can be made Informational. Working with an editor might help to avoid additional revisions. Unless I hear otherwise I will post another update on Friday with TLS, and its references, removed as well

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

Kent, Tom, Yaron, and Ron, A new version of the draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model has been published that addresses your concerns. Thanks, Clyde On 2/20/18, 9:06 AM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" wrote: > Kent

Re: [netmod] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-21

Yaron, Thanks for your review. My answers are inline as [clw1]. On 2/18/18, 6:31 AM, "Yaron Sheffer" wrote: Reviewer: Yaron Sheffer Review result: Has Issues General Comments * The semantics of pattern matching is not clear: "and/or the message

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-20

Kent, I published a new draft that fixes the last two points. Thanks, Clyde From: Kent Watsen Date: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 10:11 AM To: Mahesh Jethanandani Cc: Clyde Wildes , "t.petch" , Yaron

Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: (with COMMENT)

Adam, An earlier version of the model (draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-08 and prior) included “terminal” as a syslog destination which addresses your requirement below: +--rw terminal {terminal-action}? | +--rw all-terminals! | | +--rw log-selector

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: (with COMMENT)

Alexey, Your minor comments are addressed below… On 3/6/18, 12:06 PM, "Alexey Melnikov" wrote: Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: (with COMMENT)

Alexey, I believe that I have addressed both of your concerns in the about to be published draft. Thanks, Clyde On 3/9/18, 6:44 AM, "Alexey Melnikov" <aamelni...@fastmail.fm> wrote: Hi Clyde, On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, at 9:28 PM, Clyde Wildes (cwildes) wro

Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: (with COMMENT)

Adam, A new draft will be published soon that addresses your concern and I have used your wording. Thanks, Clyde On 3/9/18, 6:09 AM, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bcla...@cisco.com> wrote: On 3/9/2018 2:27 AM, Adam Roach wrote: > On 3/8/18 12:18 PM, Clyde Wil

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23

log-model-23 On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Clyde Wildes (cwildes) <cwil...@cisco.com<mailto:cwil...@cisco.com>> wrote: Bob, Syslog message severity is set in RFC 5424 Table 2. The model in draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23 conforms to that specification. A lower number means higher

Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23

Bob, Syslog message severity is set in RFC 5424 Table 2. The model in draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23 conforms to that specification. A lower number means higher severity. The severity-filter specifies that “all messages of the specified severity and greater match” and therefore will be