Hi Benoit, On 2018-02-07 12:56, Benoit Claise wrote: > Hi Henrik, > > Could this check be added to idnits?
Yes. I thought I had something like this already, but it was specifically
to look out for mentions of RFC2119.
As you may know, I'm due to begin a complete rewrite of idnits, from the
current implementation (idnits started as a 10-line AWK program to check
draft line lengths, in 2000 or 2001) to Python, this March. I'd like to
defer this till then; adding code to the now close to 4000 lines of mixed
AWK and bash isn't always straightforward.
Best regards,
Henrik
> Regards, Benoit
>> I just came across (yet) another example of a reference to an RFC in a
>> description clause of a YANG module that appears nowhere else in the
>> I-D.
>>
>> This seems to be a systematic error that some YANG module authors make;
>> can the tools be modified to pick it up? The logic is simple enough.
>>
>> The latest example is in draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-09 which fails to
>> reference RFC5952; I think that the I-D is in the RFC Editor queue.
>>
>> Tom Petch
>>
>> .
>>
>
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
