Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for this very readable and informative document. I am balloting YES, but I do have a few minor comments: Substantive Comments: §3, first paragraph: Can there be a citation for internet-draft guidelines? Also, it seems odd to have a normative MUST for I-D guidelines, but the RFC guidelines are not normative? §3.5: Is the referenced draft in the example likely to become an RFC prior to publication? As it is, the way it is referenced looks a lot like a citation, which are not recommended in an abstract. §3.7: The URL in the second paragraph is very dependent on the structure of the tools pages. Any reorganization of those pages is likely to break the link. I wonder if there is a way to alias that to something less brittle. §4.8, 2nd paragraph: I’m surprised to see the WG mail list a MUST level requirement here. WGs (and their mailing lists) come and go. I think, in many cases, it would make more sense to list the IESG as the contact, at least for standards track models. (I’ve seen us do that more often lately for IANA registrations, and this seems in the same spirit.) I can see that it might still make sense to reference the WG list in some circumstances, but MUST seems excessive. . Editorial Comments and Nits: §3.9, last paragraph: There are two clauses starting with “, which”, which I think are intended as restrictive clauses. Consider s/“, which”/“that” _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
